Analisis Naratif: Perspektif Partai Oposisi terhadap Diberhentikannya Tayangan Indonesian Lawyer Club TV One dalam Menyikapi Isu Demokrasi Indonesia

Narrative Analysis: Opposition Party Perspectives Against the Discontinuation of Indonesian Lawyer Club TV One Shows in Responding to Indonesian Democracy Issues

Authors

  • Arizal Arizal Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Banjarmasin
  • Banda Napitulu Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Banjarmasin
  • Dita Lestari Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Banjarmasin
  • Lody Winata Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Banjarmasin
  • Lucytha Carolina Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Banjarmasin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6888-1882
  • Muzahid Akbar Hayat Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Banjarmasin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6378-0601

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33084/anterior.v22iSpecial-1.3086

Keywords:

Opposition Party Perspective, Termination of ILC Impressions, Issues of Democracy

Abstract

Mass media has had a huge impact on the history of human life. The Indonesia Lawyers Club (ILC) talk show hosted by senior journalist Karni Ilyas is rumored to have stopped airing. This drew a response from various politicians including opposition politicians who were very sorry for not re-airing the event as a forum for democratic aspirations that were sufficient transparency in the show to the public. The purpose of this study is to find out the state of democracy in Indonesia through the media of criticism by analyzing how perspective through the perspective of narrative analysis of statements of opposition party politicians regarding the dismissal of Indonesian Lawyer Club shows on TV One in addressing the issue of Indonesian democracy. The method used in this study is with a qualitative approach with a narrative analysis framework method by analyzing the content of news. The results stated that Fadli revealed this news is sad news and bad news for democracy. Because there are currently very few platforms that provide freedom of expression. In conclusion, fadli's allegations were corroborated by Karli Ilyas' answer to Mahfud MD's question about intimidation in various directions. At the same time, the mass media plays an important role in functioning the democratic government to the people.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Botei, M. (2017). MASS-MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY IN ROMANIA. 10(59), 7.
Del Rosario González, L. (2019). Democracia, esfera pública y medios de comunicación. Vivat Academia, 25–44. https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2019.149.25-44
Dicecar Mahfud MD, Karni Ilyas Akhirnya Bongkar Alasan ILC Tutup, Ditekan Penguasa? (2021, September 27). Merdeka.Com. https://www.merdeka.com/trending/dicecar- mahfud-md-karni-ilyas-akhirnya-bongkar-alasan-ilc-tutup-ditekan-penguasa.html
Eriyanto, E. (2015). Analisis naratif: Dasar-dasar dan penerapannya dalam analisis teks berita: Vol. Cet.2 (1st ed.). Kencana.
Fajar, A. M., & Hotrun Siregar, Ms. (2021). PEMIKIRAN POLITIK ABDURRAHMAN WAHID TENTANG DEMOKRASI DI INDONESIA. Communitarian, 3(1), Article 1. http://www.ejurnal.ubk.ac.id/index.php/communitarian/article/view/141
http://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/PERSEPSI/article/view/3952, Mahdi, N., & Sembiring, M. F. (2019). Analisis Framing Reuni 212 Pada Acara Indonesia Lawyer Club di TVOne. Persepsi: Communication Journal, 2(2), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.30596/persepsi.v2i2.3952
ILC Episode Terakhir, Fadli Zon: Kelihatannya Demokrasi Telah Dimatikan. (2020, December 15). suara.com. https://www.suara.com/news/2020/12/15/201609/ilc- episode-terakhir-fadli-zon-kelihatannya-demokrasi-telah-dimatikan
Mayasari, M., Unde, A. A., & Sultan, M. I. (2016). Makna Tayangan Indonesia Lawyers Club di Tvone (Wacana Kritis Mengenai Keterlibatan Anas Urbaningrum dalam Korupsi Hambalang). KAREBA: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(1), 62–69.
Nasution, L. (2020). Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi dalam Ruang Publik di Era Digital. ADALAH, 4(3), 37–48.
Nuna, M., & Moonti, R. M. (2019). KEBEBASAN HAK SOSIAL-POLITIK DAN PARTISIPASI WARGA NEGARA DALAM SISTEM DEMOKRASI DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 4(2), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i2.1652
Nurhidayat, N. (2021). MATINYA DEMOKRASI. AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v2i2.273
Susanto, E. H. (2017). Media Massa, Pemerintah dan Pemilik Modal. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 1(6), 477. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v1i6.53
Unde, A. A., & Sultan, I. (2015). MAKNA TAYANGAN INDONESIA LAWYERS CLUB DI TVONE (WACANA KRITIS MENGENAI KETERLIBATAN ANAS URBANINGRUM DALAM KORUPSI HAMBALANG). 8.
Walulya, G., & Nassanga, G. L. (2020). Democracy at Stake: Self-Censorship as a Self- Defence Strategy for Journalists. Media and Communication, 8(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i1.2512

Downloads

Published

2022-02-28

How to Cite

Arizal, A., Napitulu, B., Lestari, D., Winata, L., Carolina, L., & Hayat, M. A. (2022). Analisis Naratif: Perspektif Partai Oposisi terhadap Diberhentikannya Tayangan Indonesian Lawyer Club TV One dalam Menyikapi Isu Demokrasi Indonesia: Narrative Analysis: Opposition Party Perspectives Against the Discontinuation of Indonesian Lawyer Club TV One Shows in Responding to Indonesian Democracy Issues. Anterior Jurnal, 22(Special-1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.33084/anterior.v22iSpecial-1.3086