Pengaruh Cekaman Kekeringan Terhadap Kandungan Klorofil dan Prolin Daun Kedelai

  • Pienyani Rosawanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya
Keywords: chlorophyll, genotype, PEG, prolin

Abstract

The study of physiological responses of soybean to drought stress could be a useful tool to the understanding of the mechanisms of drought resistance. Study was conducted to evaluate the effect of water stress on chlorophyll and prolin accumulation rate. This study was conducted in the Cikabayan greenhouse IPB using ten genotypes of soybean (Ratai, Seulawah, Slamet, Tanggamus, Wilis, GC 22-10, PG 57-1, SC 21-5, SC 39-1, SP 30-4) and PEG (0%, 20%). The result showed that drought stress with PEG simulation significant effect on chlorophyll and proline content.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pienyani Rosawanti, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya
Lecturer in Agrotechnology Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

References

Afa LO, Purwoko BS, Junaedi A, Haridjaja O, Dewi IS. 2013. Deteksi dini toleransi padi hibrida terhadap kekeringan menggunakan PEG 6000. J Agron Indonesia. 41(1): 9–15.
Ai NS, Banyo Y. 2011. Konsentrasi klorofil daun sebagai indikator kekurangan air pada tanaman. J Ilmiah Sains.11(2):166-173.
Aini SN. 2013. Adaptasi morfologi dan fisiologi beberapa genotype kedelai (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) pada kondisi cekaman kekeringan dan aluminium [tesis]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Alonso R, Elvira S, Castillo FJ, Gimeno BS. 2001. Interactive effects of ozone and drought stress on pigments and activities of antioxidative enzymes in Pinus halepensis. Plant Cell Environ. 24:905-916.
Arifai M. 2009. Respon anatomi daun dan parameter fotosintesis tumbuhan padi[tesis]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Ashri K. 2006. Akumulasi enzim antioksidan dan prolin pada beberapa varietas kedelai toleran dan peka cekaman kekeringan [tesis]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Bates LS, WaldornRP, Teare ID. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil. 39:205-208.
Bhardwaj J, Yadav SK. 2012. Comparative study on biochemical parameters and antioksidant enzymes in a drought tolerant and a sensitive variety of horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) under drought stress. AmJ Plant Physiol. 7(1):17-29.
Fitter AH, Hay RKM. 1981. Fisiologi Lingkungan Tanaman. Andayani S, Purbayanti ED, penerjemah; Srigandono B,
editor.Yogyakarta (ID): UGM PR. Terjemahan dari: Enviromental Physiology of Plants.
Gardner FP, Pearce RB and Mitchell RL. 1991. Fisiologi Tanaman Budidaya. Susilo H, Subiyanto, penerjemah. Jakarta (ID): UI Pr. Terjemahan dari: Physiology of Crop Plants.
Hamim, Sopandie D, Jusuf M. 1996. Beberapa karakteristik morfologi dan fisiologi kedelai toleran dan peka terhadap cekaman kekeringan. Hayati.
Jaleel CA, Manivannan P, Wahid A, Farooq M, Somasundaram R, Panneerselvam R. 2009. Drought stress in plants: a review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. Int J Agric Biol. 11: 100–105.
Kalefetoglu T. Ekmekci Y. 2005. The effects of drought on plants and tolerantmechanisms. J Sci. 18(4):723-740.
Kocheva K, Georgiev G. 2003. Evaluation of the reaction of two contrasting barley (Hordeum vulgarelL.) cultivars in response to osmotic stress with PEG 6000. BulgJ Plant Physiol Special Issue:290-294.
Kozlowski. 1968. Water Deficits and Plant Growth. Ed ke-3. New York(US): Academic Pr.
Kusvuran, S. 2012. Influence of drought stress on growth,ion accumulation and anti-oxidative enzymes in okragenotypes. International J Agric Biol.14: 401–406.
Laranjo JG, Coutinho JP, Galhano V, Cordeiro V. 2006. Responses of five almond cultivars to irrigation: photosynthesis and leaf water potential. Agricultural Water and Management 83: 261-265 PAPER
Lei W, Tong Z, Shengyan D. 2006. Effect of drought and rewatering on photosynthetic physioecological characteristics of soybean. Acta Ecologica Sinica 26(7): 2073-2078
Levitt J. 1980. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses. Ed ke-2. NewYork (US): Academic Pr.
Li R, Guo P, Baum M, Grando S, Ceccarelli S. 2006. Evaluation of chlorophyll content and fluorescence parameters as indicators of drought tolerantin barley.Agric Sci. 5(10):751-757.
Lovisolo CA. Schubert. 1998. Effects of water stress on vessel size and xylem hydraulicconductivity inVitis viniferaL. J ExpBot. 49(321):693–700.
Marschner H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Ed ke-2. London (GB): Academic Pr.
Radhouane, L. 2007. Response of Tunisian autochthonous pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) to drought stress induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000. Afr J Biotech. 6(9):1102-1105.
Sims DA, Gamon JA. 2002. Relationship between leaf pigmen content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structure and developmental stages. Remot Sens Environ.81:337-354.
Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Agarwal SK, Zhu J, Zhu JK. 2006. Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. The Plant J. 45:523-539.
Warid. 2014. Pengembangan kedelai (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) tolrean terhadap cekaman kekeringan menggunakan iradiasi sinar gamma [tesis]. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor
Published
2016-06-01
How to Cite
Rosawanti, P. (2016). Pengaruh Cekaman Kekeringan Terhadap Kandungan Klorofil dan Prolin Daun Kedelai. Anterior Jurnal, 15(2), 172-179. https://doi.org/10.33084/anterior.v15i2.52

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>