https://journal.umpr.ac.id/index.php/adil/issue/feed Adil Ka'Talino: Jurnal Hukum dan Wacana Keadilan 2026-06-30T00:00:00+00:00 Muhammad Wahdini muhammadwahdini99@gmail.com Open Journal Systems <table width="629"> <tbody> <tr> <td width="143"> <p>Title</p> </td> <td width="19"> <p><strong>: </strong></p> </td> <td width="467"> <p><strong>Adil Ka'Talino: Jurnal Hukum dan Wacana Keadilan</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="143"> <p>Subject</p> </td> <td width="19"> <p><strong>: </strong></p> </td> <td width="467"> <p><strong>Legal studies</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="143"> <p>Frequency</p> </td> <td width="19"> <p><strong>: </strong></p> </td> <td width="467"> <p><strong>Two-monthly (2 issues per year in June and December)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="143"> <p>Publisher</p> </td> <td width="19"> <p><strong>: </strong></p> </td> <td width="467"> <p><strong><a href="http://lp2m.umpr.ac.id/">Institute for Research and Community Services </a><a href="http://umpalangkaraya.ac.id/">Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya</a></strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="143"> <p>Editor in Chief</p> </td> <td width="19"> <p><strong>: </strong></p> </td> <td width="467"> <p><strong><a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=JAHK_eUAAAAJ&amp;hl=id">Muhammad Wahdini</a> (Scopus ID:</strong><strong> 59208327700)</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span dir="auto" style="vertical-align: inherit;">Adil Ka'Talino: Jurnal Hukum dan Wacana Keadilan</span></span></strong><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span dir="auto" style="vertical-align: inherit;"> (E-ISSN xxxx-xxxx) is a double-blind, peer-reviewed, open-access journal established by the <a href="https://fh.umpr.ac.id/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Palangka Raya</a>. This journal is provided for researchers, practitioners, and academics to submit their best scholarly works in the field of law and justice studies.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><span dir="auto" style="vertical-align: inherit;">The journal publishes both empirical and theoretical research that critically examines legal development, legal policy, constitutionalism, human rights, socio-legal studies, and contemporary justice issues, with particular attention to Indonesian legal dynamics. With a contextual and transnational perspective, the journal explores legal problems that transcend national boundaries, addressing comparative legal systems, global justice challenges, and the evolving interaction between law, society, and state governance. <strong>The journal particularly encourages scholarship on law and society, legal pluralism, customary law, and justice issues in Borneo (Kalimantan), while remaining open to broader legal studies from national and international perspectives</strong>. </span></p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><span dir="auto" style="vertical-align: inherit;">It aims to contribute to critical legal discourse and the advancement of justice-oriented scholarship at national and international levels. We regularly publish the issues in June and December every year. The journal much prefers research-based papers regarding the coverage areas. All submitted papers will be reviewed by the Editorial. If it was matched with the journal scope, the paper will be then reviewed by our respected peer-reviewers.</span></p> https://journal.umpr.ac.id/index.php/adil/article/view/12526 The Interrelationship Between the Presidential Threshold and the Parliamentary Threshold in Indonesia’s Electoral System: Weighing the Balance Between Governmental Stability and Democratic Representation 2026-06-23T22:32:20+00:00 Hasanah hasanahhumai@gmail.com Ichwan Ahnaz Alamudi ichwanahnazalamudi19@gmail.com Rabiatul Afwaliah rabiatulafwa@gmail.com <p>This study examines the interrelationship between the Presidential Threshold (PT) and the Parliamentary Threshold (ParT) within Indonesia's electoral system under Law Number 7 of 2017 on General Elections. Unlike previous studies that predominantly analyse these threshold mechanisms separately, this research investigates their interaction as an integrated institutional design. It evaluates their combined impact on the simplification of the political party system, democratic representation, and governmental stability. Employing a normative legal approach grounded in library research, the study analyses constitutional provisions, statutory regulations, judicial decisions, academic literature, and Sinta-indexed legal journals to assess the legal and political consequences of Indonesia's dual-threshold framework. The findings demonstrate that the interaction between PT and ParT has significantly influenced party coalition formation, presidential nomination, legislative representation, and the overall competitiveness of elections. While the dual-threshold mechanism helps reduce excessive party fragmentation and strengthen the effectiveness of the presidential system, it also limits political inclusiveness by restricting the participation of smaller parties and reducing the number of electoral alternatives available to voters. Consequently, political decision-making becomes concentrated among larger political parties, potentially affecting legislative representation, policy formulation, and the constitutional principle of equal political participation. The study further argues that Indonesia's electoral system cannot achieve effectiveness through threshold mechanisms alone but requires a comprehensive institutional design that balances party system simplification with democratic inclusiveness. It concludes that the current dual-threshold arrangement should be periodically re-evaluated to ensure proportionality between governmental stability, constitutional democracy, and fair political representation in accordance with the principles of Indonesia's constitutional order</p> 2026-07-03T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Hasanah, Ichawan Ahnaz Alamudi, Rabiatul Afwaliah https://journal.umpr.ac.id/index.php/adil/article/view/13348 Integration of Customary Law into the Criminal Procedure System through Transcendental-Based Restorative Justice: A Comparative Study of the Utilization of Local Wisdom Instruments 2026-06-23T22:24:31+00:00 Hasan Madilis madilishasan05@gmail.com <p>The integration of Customary Law into the Criminal Procedure System through a Transcendental Approach to Restorative Justice represents a significant legal innovation. It offers a conceptual framework for addressing practical and sociological legal needs. The restorative justice mechanism provides a criminal justice process that is faster, more affordable, and more efficient in resolving criminal cases according to the nature and characteristics of the offense. This mechanism also creates opportunities for legal development by enabling the discovery of law through the manifestation of <em>living law</em> in the conduct of legislators, law enforcement officials, and society, which simultaneously functions as both the subject and the object of law. This paper focuses on a comparative analysis between the technical mechanisms of restorative justice and the characteristics of local wisdom embodied in customary law as a means of resolving community conflicts. Such a comparison is intended to strengthen the theoretical foundation of the sociology of criminal law while promoting a legal framework that is persuasive, responsive, expeditious, cost-effective, and efficient. Furthermore, this study aims to provide a conceptual and speculative framework that may serve as a stimulus for developing hypotheses and examining empirical realities concerning the integration of customary law into the criminal procedure subsystem through a transcendental approach to restorative justice in the resolution of community conflicts. This study employs a descriptive research design grounded in library research, with the collected data analyzed qualitatively.</p> 2026-07-03T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Hasan Madilis