<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Institute for Research and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">.</journal-id>
      <journal-title>Institute for Research and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">2621-4814</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2621-4814</issn><publisher>
      	<publisher-name>Institute for Research and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33084/bjop.v5i3.3262</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group><subject>Marsilea crenata Presl.</subject><subject>Environmental-controlled growth</subject><subject>Neuroinflammatory</subject><subject>HMC3 microglia cells</subject><subject>Phytoestrogens</subject></subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Metabolite Profiling of the Environmental-Controlled Growth of Marsilea crenata Presl. and Its In Vitro and In Silico Antineuroinflammatory Properties</article-title><subtitle>Metabolite Profiling of the Environmental-Controlled Growth of Marsilea crenata Presl. and Its In Vitro and In Silico Antineuroinflammatory Properties</subtitle></title-group>
      <contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Ma'arif</surname>
		<given-names>Burhan</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Department of Pharmacy, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, East Java, Indonesia</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Muslikh</surname>
		<given-names>Faisal Akhmal</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Master Program of Pharmaceutical Science, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Amalia</surname>
		<given-names>Dilla</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Department of Pharmacy, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, East Java, Indonesia</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Mahardiani</surname>
		<given-names>Anisah</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Department of Pharmacy, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, East Java, Indonesia</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Muchlasi</surname>
		<given-names>Luthfi Achmad</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Department of Pharmacy, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, East Java, Indonesia</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Riwanti</surname>
		<given-names>Pramudita</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Department of Pharmacy, Universitas Hang Tuah, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Taek</surname>
		<given-names>Maximus Markus</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Department of Chemistry, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Kupang, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Laswati</surname>
		<given-names>Hening</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Agil</surname>
		<given-names>Mangestuti</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia</aff>
	</contrib></contrib-group>		
      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>31</day>
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>5</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2022 Burhan Ma'arif, Faisal Akhmal Muslikh, Dilla Amalia, Anisah Mahardiani, Luthfi Achmad Muchlasi, Pramudita Riwanti, Maximus Markus Taek, Hening Laswati, Mangestuti Agil</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.</p></license>      </permissions>
      <related-article related-article-type="companion" vol="2" page="e235" id="RA1" ext-link-type="pmc">
			<article-title>Metabolite Profiling of the Environmental-Controlled Growth of Marsilea crenata Presl. and Its In Vitro and In Silico Antineuroinflammatory Properties</article-title>
      </related-article>
	  <abstract abstract-type="toc">
		<p>
			This study was aimed to evaluate the metabolite contents and antineuroinflammatory potential of Marsilea crenata Presl. grown under a controlled environmental condition. The antineuroinflammatory test has been carried out in vitro using ethanolic extract of M. crenata leaves on HMC3 microglia cells. An in silico approach was applied to predict the active compounds of the extract. The HMC3 microglia cells were induced with IFNγ to create prolonged inflammatory conditions and then treated with 96 ethanolic extract of the M. crenata leaves of 62.5, 125, and 250 μg/mL. The expression of MHC II was analyzed using the ICC method with the CLSM instrument. Metabolites of the extract were profiled using UPLC-QToF-MS/MS instrument and MassLynx 4.1 software. In silico evaluation was conducted with molecular docking on 3OLS protein using PyRx 0.8 software, and physicochemical properties of the compounds were analyzed using SwissADME webtool. The ethanolic extract of M. crenata leaves could reduce the MHC II expression in HMC3 microglia cells in all concentrations with the values 97.458, 139.574, and 82.128 AU. The result of metabolite profiling found 79 compounds in the extract. In silico evaluation showed that 19 compounds gave agonist interaction toward 3OLS, and three met all parameters of physicochemical analysis. The ethanolic extract of the environmental-controlled growth of M. crenata leaves antineuroinflammatory activity on HMC3 microglia cells. The extract was predicted to contain some phytoestrogen compounds which act as 3OLS agonists.
		</p>
		</abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body><sec>
			<title>INTRODUCTION</title>
				<p >The prevalence
of postmenopausal women worldwide is gotten higher over several decades<bold>1</bold>. This increase is closely related to a direct decline in quality of life<bold>2</bold><bold>,</bold><bold>3</bold>. Women in the postmenopause phase will experience various disease
complaints caused by estrogen deficiency conditions, one of which is a
neurodegenerative disorder<bold>4</bold>.</p><p >Neuroinflammation
is one of the leading causes of neurodegenerative disorders arising from
estrogen deficiency<bold>5</bold><bold>,</bold><bold>6</bold>. Neuroinflammation occurs due to an increase in activated microglia in the
M1 polarization situation so that it can increase the expression of
proinflammatory signaling factors such as major histocompatibility complex II
(MHC II) and other inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1 (IL-1),
interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and nitric oxide (NO) in
the brain<bold>7</bold><bold>,</bold><bold>8</bold>. Increased inflammatory cytokines will reduce synapsis and plasticity
functions of neuron cells and induce cell death<bold>9</bold>. </p><p >Celecoxib, ibuprofen,
minocycline, and aspirin are some medicines used to treat neuroinflammation<bold>10</bold><bold>,</bold><bold>11</bold>. However, those medicines appear with potential side effects in the form
of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) disorders such as nausea, gastritis, abdominal
pain, and digestive tract bleeding, as well as other side effects such as
dizziness, hypertension, headache, and vertigo<bold>12</bold><bold>-</bold><bold>14</bold>. These side effects encourage the need for various studies on potential new
drug sources with minimal side effects, such as phytoestrogens<bold>15</bold><bold>-</bold><bold>18</bold>. Phytoestrogens are a group of natural plant products with a structure and
function similar to 17β-estradiol<bold>19</bold><bold>-</bold><bold>21</bold>.</p><p >Marsilea crenata Presl. is one of the plants used
as the typical food by the local community in East Java, Indonesia<bold>22</bold>. Ethanol 96% extract of M. crenata leaves been tested by
radioimmunoassay (RIA) and shows a high estrogen-like substance<bold>23</bold>. Other previous studies also have shown that this plant contains phytoestrogen
group compounds, such as flavonoids, that can act as an anti-inflammatory and
has other estrogenic activity for maintaining human body homeostasis<bold>24</bold><bold>-</bold><bold>28</bold>.</p><p >In this
research, we cultivated M. crenata under external controlled factors to
gain a standardized raw material of this plant. Cultivation was carried out in
Kediri, East Java, Indonesia. This area is a lowland of 0-200 m above sea level (masl), with humidity of 60-90% and an average temperature
of 23.8-30.7°C<bold>29</bold>. The plant was cultivated in a greenhouse under controlled nutrition,
soil, irrigation, and some environmental factors, to produce better quality and
quantity of the raw material of this plant<bold>30</bold><bold>-</bold><bold>33</bold>.</p><p >This study
aimed to prove the antineuroinflammatory activity of the 96% ethanolic extract
of the leaves of M. crenata grown under controlled environmental
conditions in inhibiting HMC3 microglia cells. This inhibition was observed in
the situation of M1 polarization of these cells, with a decrease of MHC II
expression as an indicator. This study also aimed to predict phytoestrogen
compounds that play a role in the antineuroinflammatory activity through
metabolite profiling using ultra-performance liquid chromatography – quadrupole
time of flight – mass spectrometry (UPLC-QToF-MS/MS) and in silico
studies of those compounds on estrogen receptors β (ERβ), which, in this case
using protein 3OLS from protein data bank (PDB).</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
				<p ><bold>Materials</bold></p><p >Plant materials</p><p >The leaves of M.
crenata were harvested from a controlled farming (greenhouse) in Kediri,
East Java, Indonesia. The characteristics of the plants were two weeks old, the
stem height was approximately 17 cm, the leaf width was approximately 2 cm, and
the color of the leaves was dark green. The leaves were then identified at Unit
Pelayanan Teknis (UPT) Materia Medika, Batu, East Java, Indonesia, with the
determination key of 1a-17b-18a-1 and identification letter 074/368/102.7/2017.
The specification of the cultivation area and the external factors are listed
in <bold>Table I</bold>.</p><p ><bold>Tab</bold><bold>le</bold><bold>I</bold><bold>.</bold> Specification of location and
external factors in the cultivation of M. crenata</p>

<table-wrap><label>Table</label><table>
 <tr>
  <td>
  Parameter
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Value
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  Region
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Pagu,
  Kediri, East Java, Indonesia
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  Height
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Lowland, 0-200 masl
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  Rainfall
  </td>
  
  <td>
  130-150 mm
  per year, with the rainy day number average for 6-15 days
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  Climate
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Tropical with 2 seasons
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  Temperature
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Average
  maximum temperature of 30.7°C
  Average
  minimum temperature of 23.8°C
  Annual
  average temperature of 27.2°C
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  Humidity
  </td>
  
  <td>
  60-90%
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  Irrigation
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Ground
  water
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  Growing Media
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Not submerged with water
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  Fertilizer
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Organic fertilizer with specification:
  C Organic ≥ 15%
  C/N Ratio : 15-25
  pH : 4-9
  Water Content : 8-20%
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  Plantation Location
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Green house
  </td>
  
 </tr>
</table></table-wrap>

<p >Chemicals</p><p >Fetal
bovine serum (FBS), penicillin, streptomycin, Eagle's minimum essential medium
(EMEM), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), tween 80, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS),
paraformaldehyde (PFA), bovine serum albumin (BSA), fluorescein isothiocyanate
(FITC) anti-rabbit secondary antibody were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St.
Louis, USA). MHC II anti-rabbit secondary antibody was purchased from Abcam
(Cambridge, UK). Ethanol 96%, dichloromethane, methanol, acetonitrile, and formic
acid were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).</p><p >Hardware and
software</p><p >The hardware used
was an A416MA-EB422TS personal computer with Intel Celeron. The software used
is the operating system Windows® 10. ChemDraw Ultra 12.0 was used in drawing 2D
structures. Avogadro 1.0.1 was used in structural optimization. The docking
process was done with AutoDock Vina using PyRx 0.8. Visualization of docking
results was performed using Biovia Discovery Studio 2016.</p><p ><bold>Methods</bold></p><p >Extraction</p><p >About
500 g of powdered leaves of M. crenata were extracted with 96% ethanol
using the ultrasonic method with Soltec Sonica 5300EP S3 for 3 x 10 minutes,
filtered, and evaporated at 50°C using a Heidolph G3 rotary evaporator. A 25 g
of the 96% ethanolic extract was obtained and subjected to further test and
analysis.</p><p >Cell culture</p><p >HMC3
microglia cells (ATCC® CRL-3304™) were cultured using complete media in 25 cm2-sized
flasks which contained 10% of FBS and a mixture of 1% of penicillin-streptomycin
in a ±5 mL media EMEM. Cells in the flask were then incubated in a 5% CO2
ThermoScientific Hera Cell 150i incubator at 37°C for a week. The cells were
then placed into a 24-well microplate after the confluence was approximately
80%.</p><p >Measurement of MHC
II expression</p><p >As much
as 40 mg of the 96% ethanolic extract was suspended in the mixture of 0.5% DMSO
and 0.5% Tween 80 to produce the mother liquor of 4,000 μg/mL; it was then
diluted in the concentration of 62.5; 125; 250 μg/mL. About 40 μL of genistein
was added with the culture media reaching 0.8 mL to produce genistein with the
concentration of 50 μM, which was used as the positive control. Induction of
IFN-γ was performed after cells were cultured on a 24-well microplate and reached
80% confluence. After induction of 10 ng IFN-γ for 24 hours, the cells were
rinsed with PBS and then treated with 50 μM genistein for 48 hours. The cells
were then fixated with 4% PFA, Triton X-100, and blocking buffer, and also
primary and secondary antibodies were added. They were, afterward, rinsed using
PBS and visualized MHC II with CLSM (Olympus Fluoview Ver. 4.2a.) 488 nm<bold>34</bold>.</p><p >Metabolite profiling</p><p >The
process of metabolite profiling was conducted at Pusat Laboratorium Forensik
Badan Reserse Kriminal Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia (Puslabfor Bareskrim
Polri) by using UPLC-QToF-MS/MS instrument. 96% ethanolic extract was prepared
using dichloromethane and methanol solvents through the solid phase extraction
(SPE) method. After that, 5 µL was equally injected into ACQUITY UPLC® H-Class
System (Waters, USA) with the detector of MS Xevo G2-S QToF (Waters, USA).
Samples were separated in the column of ACQUITY BEH C18 (1.7 µm × 2.1 mm × 50
mm) with acetonitrile of + 0.05% of formic acid and water + 0.05% of formic
acid as the mobile phase, with the flow rate of 0.2 mL/minute. The analysis
result of UPLC-QToF-MS/MS was processed using MassLynx 4.1 software to get
chromatogram data and m/z spectrum from each detected peak. The detected
compounds were then confirmed using the online database of ChemSpider (http://www.chemspider.com), PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), and MassBank (https://massbank.eu/MassBank).</p><p >In silico study</p><p >X-ray protein from
ERβ was attained from the protein data bank (http://www.rcsb.org) with the PDB
ID 3OLS. The antineuroinflammatory impact to be evaluated in this study is the
antineuroinflammatory effect that emerges from phytoestrogens in plants,
replacing the role of estrogen in the ER-dependent pathway and not through
other mechanisms. ERβ also has a higher amount than other receptors, is more
sensitive to estrogen binding, and plays the most role in regulating nerve cell
homeostasis<bold>35</bold><bold>,</bold><bold>36</bold>.</p><p >The initial
preparation was performed to separate native ligand (17β-estradiol) from 3OLS
protein using Biovia Discovery Studio Visualizer 2016 and saved in Sybyl mol2
format. Metabolite profiling compounds drawn 2D using ChemDraw Ultra 12.0 and
saved in mol format. Internal validation was performed by adding 3OLS and
17-estradiol ligands and then docking them with PyRx 0.8 software. Native
ligand and the result compounds of metabolite profiling were then optimized
with Avogrado 1.0.1 using the MMFF94 method. Then, molecular docking was
conducted using PyRx 0.8 with the AutoDock Vina method to simulate the docking
process. All compound files were imported into the PyRx 0.8 software and
converted to pdbqt format automatically. The determination of the grid box
includes setting location according with grid center x = 11.1148, y = -35.813,
and z = 12.1403 with dimension of 25 x 25 x 25 Å. Setting the exhaustiveness to
number 8 and the work grid through Autogrid to 17-estradiol ligand completed
the operation, yielding a binding affinity value and a molecular docking
compound in the form of pdbqt. The result of complex visualization between
receptor and ligand was observed using Biovia Discovery Studio Visualizer 2016
to see the interaction that occurred. To see the compound's potential as oral
medicine, then the compounds which had the agonist interaction were processed
with physicochemical analysis using the SwissADME web tool to find out the
penetration capability.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title>
				<p >Measurement of MHC
II expression</p><p ><bold>Figure 1</bold> was the
visualization result using the CLSM instrument, which displayed MHC II
fluorescence intensity in the figure. IFNγ induction for 24 hours can activate
nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) through toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), which can
affect cell protein synthesis, so that it can activate the microglia in M1
polarization and change its morphology into amoeboid, which cause the
appearance of the inflammatory mediator, one of them is MHC II<bold>16</bold><bold>,</bold><bold>17</bold><bold>,</bold><bold>37</bold><bold>,</bold><bold>38</bold>. IFNγ plays the
role of activating the microglia and can increase MHC II molecule expression as
the transcription activator. MHC II plays a role in producing the exogen
antigen, activating the T helper cell through the receptor, and secreting
several cytokines to manage the immune response<bold>39</bold><bold>,</bold><bold>40</bold>. The strongest
intensity was seen on the negative control, and the weakest intensity was seen
on the positive control. In the negative control, treatment was not given, so
it caused the HMC3 microglia cells to stay active on M1 polarization and
produced high MHC II fluorescence intensity. All treatment groups showed lower
MHC II fluorescence intensity compared to the negative control.</p><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table>
    <tr>
     <td>
     
     a
     
     </td>
    </tr>
   </table></table-wrap><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table>
    <tr>
     <td>
     
     b
     
     </td>
    </tr>
   </table></table-wrap><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table>
    <tr>
     <td>
     
     c
     
     </td>
    </tr>
   </table></table-wrap><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table>
    <tr>
     <td>
     
     d
     
     </td>
    </tr>
   </table></table-wrap><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table>
    <tr>
     <td>
     
     e
     
     </td>
    </tr>
   </table></table-wrap><p ><bold>Figure</bold><bold>1</bold><bold>.</bold> MHC II fluorescence intensity on HMC3
microglia cells (<bold>a</bold>) negative control; (<bold>b</bold>) 62.5 μg/mL; (<bold>c</bold>)
125 μg/mL; (<bold>d</bold>) 250 μg/mL; and (<bold>e</bold>) genistein.</p><p >Furthermore, <bold>Figure 2</bold> shows MHC II
expressions comparison in the concentration of 62.5; 125; 250 μg/mL with
negative control and positive control. In all concentrations, MHC II expression
was lower compared to the negative control. The result of ANOVA test showed
significant difference in MHC II expression reduction among all concentrations
on negative control (p=0.000; p=0.000; and p=0.000) and on positive control
(p=0.000; p=0.000; and p=0.000).</p><p ><bold>Figure</bold><bold>2</bold><bold>.</bold> Expression of MHC II in 96% ethanol
extract of M. crenata leaves. The * sign indicates a significant
difference from the negative control (K-), while the ** sign indicates a
significant difference from the positive control (K+).</p><p >In <bold>Figure 2</bold>, concentration
increase was not accompanied by MHC II expression decrease. This probably
happened because of the Non-Monotonic Dose Response (NMDR) phenomenon in HMC3
microglia cells, which was indicated by various slope values in the given
concentration ranges<bold>41</bold>. NMDR often
occurred in research by using hormone treatment or sample used as the hormone
substitute, in this case, was phytoestrogen compound in 96% ethanol extract of
the environmental controlled growth M. crenata leaves.</p><p >The affinity level
difference between the hormone or sample that substituted the hormone and the
receptor could cause difficulty in predicting the response following the
increased concentration. Another factor causing NMDR was receptor
downregulation and receptor desensitization; this may happen because the
increasing concentration on the sample could cause the compound to bond with
other receptors except for ER or make ER insensitive in bonding with the
compound. However, the moment the concentration was continuously increased, it
could increase the number of ER degraded and unequal to the produced ER, which
caused the cell to produce ER massively and could increase the bond of the
compound with ER and the activity response<bold>41</bold><bold>,</bold><bold>42</bold>. </p><p >A 62.5 μg/mL
concentration was the optimum concentration for reducing MHC II fluorescence
intensity. This was because the concentration treatment showed a significant
difference from the negative control and a big fluorescence intensity
difference between the negative control value and the MHC II expression value
of 97.458 Arbitrary Unit (AU). Concentrations 62.5 and 250 μg/mL were the
concentrations that also could reduce MHC II expression well but did not differ
from each other significantly in statistics, so 62.5 μg/mL was chosen as the
most optimum concentration because the small concentration could produce a
similar effect with the concentration of 250 μg/mL. The result showed that giving
96% ethanol extract to the controlled environmental growth of M. crenata
leaves treatment reduced the number of MHC II, which was observed from the
expression reduction.</p><p >This
in vitro activity test was carried out to know the activity potential of
a plant that was given to a cell<bold>43</bold>. The result of the
in vitro test showed that the 96% ethanol extract of M. crenata leaves
had antineuroinflammatory activity, which was indicated by a significant MHC II
expression decrease. Then, to predict the compound contained in 96% ethanol
extract of M. crenata leaves, metabolite profiling was conducted<bold>44</bold>, and to predict the
compound which had antineuroinflammatory activity, in silico
analysis was carried out<bold>45</bold>.</p><p >Metabolite profiling</p><p >The metabolite
profiling result of 96% ethanol extract of the controlled environmental growth
of M. crenata leaves by using UPLC-QToF-MS/MS instrument on dichloromethane and
methanol solvents in the form of total ion chromatogram (TIC) can be seen in <bold>Figure 3</bold>. In contrast, the
value of retention time (RT), % area, m/z, molecule formula, and the compound's
name can be overviewed in <bold>Tables II</bold> and <bold>III</bold>.</p><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table>
    <tr>
     <td>
     
     a
     
     </td>
    </tr>
   </table></table-wrap><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table>
    <tr>
     <td>
     
     b
     
     </td>
    </tr>
   </table></table-wrap><p ><bold>Figure</bold><bold>3</bold><bold>.</bold> TIC of 96% ethanol extract of M.
crenata leaves in solvent (<bold>a</bold>) dichloromethane and (<bold>b</bold>)
methanol.</p><p ><bold>Tab</bold><bold>le</bold><bold>II</bold><bold>.</bold> Prediction of compounds in 96%
ethanol extract of M. crenata leaves in dichloromethane solvent</p><table-wrap><label>Table</label><table>
 <tr>
  <td>
  No.
  </td>
  
  <td>
  RT (min)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  % Area
  </td>
  
  <td>
  m/z
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Molecular
  Formula and Structure
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Compound
  Name
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  1
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.971
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.8040
  </td>
  
  <td>
  166.0053
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C3H6N2O4S
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2-Nitro-1,2-thiazolidine 1,1-dioxide
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  2
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.255
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.5705
  </td>
  
  <td>
  359.1417
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C17H21N5O2S/
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Methyl 2-({[4-amino-6-(1-piperidinyl)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]methyl}sulfanyl)benzoate
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  3
  </td>
  
  <td>
  4.058
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.3745
  </td>
  
  <td>
  238.1403
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C7H14N10
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N'',N'''''-(5-Methyl-2,4-pyrimidinediyl)dicarbonohydrazonic
  diamide
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  4
  </td>
  
  <td>
  5.554
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.0696
  </td>
  
  <td>
  363.1224
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C13H17N9O2S
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2-{[1-(1-Hydroxy-2-butanyl)-1H-tetrazol-5-yl]sulfanyl}-N-(5-methyl[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-2-yl)acetamide
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  5
  </td>
  
  <td>
  6.028
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.3691
  </td>
  
  <td>
  224.1309
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C15H16N2
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  6-Methyl-9,10-didehydroergoline
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  6
  </td>
  
  <td>
  6.407
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.0311
  </td>
  
  <td>
  184.1070
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C6H12N6O
  
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N-{(E)-Amino[2-(1-hydrazono-2-propanylidene)hydrazino]
  methylene}acetamide
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  7
  </td>
  
  <td>
  6.882
  </td>
  
  <td>
  20.2706
  </td>
  
  <td>
  226.1475
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C15H18N2
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1-(1-Naphthylmethyl) piperazine
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  8
  </td>
  
  <td>
  8.115
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.2128
  </td>
  
  <td>
  268.1938
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C18H24N2
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N-(4-Methyl-2-pentanyl)-N-phenyl-1,4-benzenediamine
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  9
  </td>
  
  <td>
  9.548
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.5447
  </td>
  
  <td>
  284.0996
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C9H8N12
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  5-Methyl-N-[1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)-1H-tetrazol-5-yl][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-2-amine
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  10
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.243
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.2945
  </td>
  
  <td>
  157.1468
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C9H19NO
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-4-piperidinol
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  11
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.422
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.1290
  </td>
  
  <td>
  224.1886
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C13H24N2O
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1,3-Dicyclohexylurea
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  12
  </td>
  
  <td>
  13.256
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.6638
  </td>
  
  <td>
  405.1003
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C19H23N3OS3
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  5-Isobutyl-2,2-dimethyl-10-(methylsulfanyl)-1,4-dihydro-2H-pyrano[4'',3'':4',5']pyrido
  [3',2':4,5]thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine-8(11H)-thione
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  13
  </td>
  
  <td>
  13.551
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.2674
  </td>
  
  <td>
  451.3150
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C22H45NO8
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  (2R,3S,4R,2'R,3'S,4'R)-5,5'-(Cyclododecylimino)di(1,2,3,4-pentanetetrol)
  </td>
  
 </tr>
</table></table-wrap><p ><bold>Tab</bold><bold>le</bold><bold>III</bold><bold>.</bold> Prediction of compounds in 96%
ethanol extract of M. crenata leaves in methanol solvent</p>

<table-wrap><label>Table</label><table>
 <tr>
  <td>
  No.
  </td>
  
  <td>
  RT (min)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  %Area
  </td>
  
  <td>
  m/z
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Molecular Formula and Structure
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Compound Name
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  1
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.013
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.1178
  </td>
  
  <td>
  150.0282
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C3H6N2O5
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  3,3-Dinitro-1-propanol
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  2
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.255
  </td>
  
  <td>
  15.3535
  </td>
  
  <td>
  235.1431
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C11H17N5O
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  4,6-Di(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1,3,5-triazin-2(5H)-one
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  3
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.930
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.8740
  </td>
  
  <td>
  293.1473
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C12H23NO7
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Methyl
  N-(3-isopropoxypropyl)-β-alaninate ethanedioate (1:1)
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  4
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2.046
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.7608
  </td>
  
  <td>
  293.1491
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C13H19N5O3
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  7-(2-Methoxyethyl)-3-methyl-8-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-3,7-dihydro-1H-purine-2,6-dione
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  5
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2.109
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.3141
  </td>
  
  <td>
  293.1454
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C16H23NO2S
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N-Cycloheptyl-2-methoxy-4-(methylsulfanyl)benzamide
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  6
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2.425
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.7979
  </td>
  
  <td>
  267.0956
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C9H17NO8
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Miserotoxin
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  7
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2.962
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.9964
  </td>
  
  <td>
  165.0790
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C9H11NO2
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Benzocaine
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  8
  </td>
  
  <td>
  3.183
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.4959
  </td>
  
  <td>
  327.1324
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C16H25NO2S2
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N-[3-(Cyclohexylsulfanyl) propyl]-4-methylbenzene
  sulfonamide
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  9
  </td>
  
  <td>
  3.858
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.6768
  </td>
  
  <td>
  187.0639
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C4H9N7S
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  (2-Methyl-2H-tetrazol-5-yl)methyl
  carbamo hydrazonothioate
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  10
  </td>
  
  <td>
  4.016
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.0231
  </td>
  
  <td>
  189.0435
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C4H13N3OCl2
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Girard Reagent D dihydrochloride
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  11
  </td>
  
  <td>
  4.258
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.7756
  </td>
  
  <td>
  354.0980
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C13H22O9S
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2,2-Dioxido-3,6,9-trioxa-2λ6-thiaundecan-11-yl
  ethyl (2E)-2-butenedioate
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  12
  </td>
  
  <td>
  4.532
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.1558
  </td>
  
  <td>
  373.1070
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C16H23NO9
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  (-)-Metanephrine glucuronide
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  13
  </td>
  
  <td>
  4.870
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.7356
  </td>
  
  <td>
  359.1002
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C11H25N3O4S3
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  3-(Ethylsulfonyl)-N-methyl-N-[3-(methylamino)propyl]-4-thiomorpholinesulfonamide
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  14
  </td>
  
  <td>
  5.133
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.0955
  </td>
  
  <td>
  431.1820
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C21H21N9O2
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  3,3'-(2,6-Pyridinediyl)bis(6-ethyl-7-methyl[1,2,4]triazolo
  [4,3-a]pyrimidin-5-ol)
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  15
  </td>
  
  <td>
  5.354
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.4942
  </td>
  
  <td>
  464.0975
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C23H20N4O3S2
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2-{[4-Ethyl-5-(2-thienyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl]sulfanyl}-N-(2-methoxydibenzo[b,d]furan-3-yl)acetamide
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  16
  </td>
  
  <td>
  5.533
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.1073
  </td>
  
  <td>
  516.1268
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C25H24O12
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1,3-Bis{[(2E)-3-(3,4-dihydroxy phenyl)-2-propenoyl]oxy}-4,5-dihydroxycyclohexane
  carboxylic acid
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  17
  </td>
  
  <td>
  5.786
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.1176
  </td>
  
  <td>
  498.1174
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C26H26O6S2
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  (1S,4S)-1,4-Dihydronaphthalene-1,4-diylbis(methylene)
  bis(4-methylbenzenesulfonate)
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  18
  </td>
  
  <td>
  5.944
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.1634
  </td>
  
  <td>
  448.1023
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C22H16N4O7
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N-[2-(3-Methoxyphenyl)-1,3-benzoxazol-5-yl]-4-methyl-3,5-dinitrobenzamide
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  19
  </td>
  
  <td>
  6.049
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.3460
  </td>
  
  <td>
  516.1278
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C26H20N4O8
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N,N'-(4,11-Dimethoxy-6,7,13,14-tetraoxo-5,6,7,12,13,14-hexahydroquinolino[2,3-b]acridine-1,8-diyl)diacetamide
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  20
  </td>
  
  <td>
  6.249
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.4796
  </td>
  
  <td>
  534.1054
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C22H22N4O10S
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  3',5'-Di-O-acetyl-2'-deoxy-5-[3-(3-nitrophenyl)-4-oxo-1,3-thiazolidin-2-yl]uridine
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  21
  </td>
  
  <td>
  6.682
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.1119
  </td>
  
  <td>
  196.1099
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C11H16O3
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  3-(Benzyloxy)-2-methyl-1,2-propanediol
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  22
  </td>
  
  <td>
  7.019
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.0473
  </td>
  
  <td>
  162.0317
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C9H6O3
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Umbelliferone
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  23
  </td>
  
  <td>
  7.124
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.0409
  </td>
  
  <td>
  712.1271
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C33H28O18
  
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1,5-Anhydro-2,6-bis-O-(3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoyl)-1-[2,4,6-trihydroxy-3-(4-hydroxybenzoyl)phenyl]hexitol
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  24
  </td>
  
  <td>
  7.345
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.0231
  </td>
  
  <td>
  366.1232
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C19H23O5Cl
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Ethyl 3-(7-butoxy-6-chloro-4-methyl-2-oxo-2H-chromen-3-yl)propanoate
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  25
  </td>
  
  <td>
  7.619
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.5161
  </td>
  
  <td>
  696.1328
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C33H28O17
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  3,4,5-Tris-O-[(2E)-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-propenoyl]-D-glucaric
  acid
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  26
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.264
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2.2174
  </td>
  
  <td>
  317.2935
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C18H39NO3
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  (2S,3S)-2-Amino-1,3,4-octadecanetriol
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  27
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.622
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.5883
  </td>
  
  <td>
  670.3158
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C28H50N2O16
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  (2S)-2,6-Bis[(5-{[(2R,3R,4S,5R,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)
  tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl]oxy}pentanoyl)amino]hexanoic acid
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  28
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.781
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.0919
  </td>
  
  <td>
  489.2842
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C26H39N3O6
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Methyl 1-{[(2-methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}prolylphenylalanylleucinate
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  29
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.906
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.1012
  </td>
  
  <td>
  241.2775
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C16H35N
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Cetylamine
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  30
  </td>
  
  <td>
  11.085
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.2922
  </td>
  
  <td>
  414.2036
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C19H31N4O4Cl
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2-{3-[(6-Acetamidohexyl)
  carbamoyl]-4-chloro-5-isopropyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl}ethyl acetate
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  31
  </td>
  
  <td>
  11.402
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.0841
  </td>
  
  <td>
  508.2642
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C23H36N6O7
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Asparaginylthreonylphenylalanyllysine
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  32
  </td>
  
  <td>
  11.497
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.2700
  </td>
  
  <td>
  301.2985
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C18H39NO2
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Safingol
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  33
  </td>
  
  <td>
  11.644
  </td>
  
  <td>
  6.1813
  </td>
  
  <td>
  414.2043
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C24H30O6
  
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  4,4'-[1,10-Decanediylbis(oxy)]
  dibenzoic acid
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  34
  </td>
  
  <td>
  11.781
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.9642
  </td>
  
  <td>
  693.3952
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C34H55N5O10
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  (2R,3S)-4-[{(2S)-1-[(2S,4S)-4-Hydroxy-2-{[(2S)-2-methyl-5-oxo-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-1-yl]carbonyl}-1-pyrrolidinyl]-3-methyl-1-oxo-2-butanyl}
  (methyl)amino]-3-[(N-methyl-N-{[(2-methyl-2-propanyl)oxy] car
  bonyl}-L-leucyl)amino]-4-oxo-2-butanyl oxoacetate
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  35
  </td>
  
  <td>
  12.297
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2.1360
  </td>
  
  <td>
  598.4022
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C25H50N12O5
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N2-Acetyl-L-arginyl-L-valyl-L-lysyl-L-argininamide
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  36
  </td>
  
  <td>
  12.497
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.0803
  </td>
  
  <td>
  700.3621
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C35H52N6O7S
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N-(3-Amino-3-methylbutanoyl)-O-methyl-L-tyrosyl-N-{(1R,2S)-3-cyclohexyl-1-[(5S)-3-ethyl-2-oxo-1,3-oxazolidin-5-yl]-1-hydroxy-2-propanyl}-3-(1,3-thiazol-4-yl)-L-alaninamide
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  37
  </td>
  
  <td>
  12.877
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.1958
  </td>
  
  <td>
  531.3407
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C27H49NO9
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  (3R,4S,6S,9R,11R,12R,13S,14R)-6-{[(2S,3R,4S,6S)-4-(Dimethylamino)-3-hydroxy-6-methyltetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl]oxy}-14-ethyl-4,12,13-trihydroxy-3,9,11,13-tetramethyloxacyclotetradecane-2,10-dione
  (non-p referred name)
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  38
  </td>
  
  <td>
  12.993
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.1111
  </td>
  
  <td>
  671.4090
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C44H53N3O3
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1,2,9-Triheptyl-1,2-dihydroisoquinolino[4',5',6':6,5,10]anthra[2,1,9-def]cinnoline-3,8,10(9H)-trione
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  39
  </td>
  
  <td>
  13.193
  </td>
  
  <td>
  14.0522
  </td>
  
  <td>
  495.3313
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C26H45N3O6
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1-(β-D-Arabinofuranosyl)-4-(heptadecanoylamino)-2(1H)-pyrimidinone
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  40
  </td>
  
  <td>
  13.646
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2.6446
  </td>
  
  <td>
  473.3724
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C22H48N9Cl
  
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N2-[3-({12-[(3-Aminopropyl)amino]dodecyl}amino)propyl]-N4-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine
  hydrochloride (1:1)
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  41
  </td>
  
  <td>
  13.951
  </td>
  
  <td>
  18.2182
  </td>
  
  <td>
  473.3770
  </td>
  
  <td>
  C32H47N3
  
   
  
  </td>
  
  <td>
  (2R)-N-Benzyl-2-{(3S)-3-benzyl-4-[2-(bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl)ethyl]-1-piperazinyl}-3-methyl-1-butanamine
  </td>
  
 </tr>
</table></table-wrap>

<p >The
result of metabolite profiling showed a total of 79 compounds in
dichloromethane and methanol solvents which consisted of 54 known and 25
unknown compounds. The use of the two solvents aimed at eluting the extract
optimally in the column of UPLC-QToF-MS/MS<bold>27</bold>. The compound peak
analyzed from the result of metabolite profiling was the RT peak between 0 and
14 minutes. The RT peak above 14 minutes could not be considered because the
peak was generally impure, like the peak produced from solvent or degradant.
From the total of detected 79 compounds, not all peaks in TIC could be
identified in the process of metabolite profiling. This was shown by the
appearance of 25 unknown compounds. Unknown compounds could not be identified
in the database; these compounds could be in the form of impure compounds or
degradant which were still detected by the instrument or new compounds which
were still not listed in the database, especially unknown compounds which had
high content<bold>27</bold><bold>,</bold><bold>46</bold>.</p><p >In silico study</p><p >The 79 compounds
from metabolite profiling of 96% ethanol extract of the controlled
environmental growth M. crenata leaves were then analyzed through
molecular docking using PyRx 0.8 software and AutoDock Vina as the docking
simulator. Based on the native ligand test (17β-estradiol) using 3OLS protein,
the value of RMSD 1.238 Å was retrieved, which showed that RMSD &lt;2 Å means
the docking protocol could be used in the docking process of resulting
compounds from metabolite profiling using 3OLS protein<bold>47</bold><bold>,</bold><bold>48</bold>. After that, the
bond between native ligand and compound towards 3OLS protein was visualized
using Biovia Discovery Visualizer 2016 software. Based on the analysis of
molecular docking 17β-estradiol result on 3OLS protein, it was found that the
compound was categorized as an ERβ agonist compound if it met several
parameters similar to 17β-estradiol. These parameters consisted of a pharmacophore
cluster that bonded His 475 amino acid to Glu 305 amino acid or Arg 346 amino
acid, which can be viewed in <bold>Figure 4</bold>. The type of bond to the amino
acid also influences the bonds' stability. This interaction describes the
binding strength of the ligand to the receptor. The hydrogen bonds can
stabilize the interaction between ligands and receptors, in addition to van der
walls and electrostatic bonds<bold>49</bold>. Besides, they also
had a pharmacophore distance similar to 17β-estradiol, approximately 10.862 Å.
The similarity in pharmacophore distance from pharmacophore cluster on
17β-estradiol could be used as a guideline to predict other compounds with the
same pharmacological effects<bold>50</bold><bold>-</bold><bold>52</bold>. The analysis using
Discovery Studio Visualizer 2016 of 79 compounds resulted from metabolite
profiling of 96% ethanol extract of the controlled environmental growth of M.
crenata leaves can be seen in <bold>Table IV</bold>.</p><p ><bold>Figure</bold><bold>4</bold><bold>.</bold> Interaction of 17β-estradiol with 3OLS
protein.</p><p ><bold>Tab</bold><bold>le</bold><bold>IV</bold><bold>.</bold> 17β-estradiol and compounds in
96% ethanol extract of M. crenata leaves which are agonists against ERβ</p>

<table-wrap><label>Table</label><table>
 <tr>
  <td>
  No.
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Compound Name
  </td>
  
  <td>
  % Area
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Binding
  Affinity
  (kkal/ mol)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Amino Acid
  (Type of Bond)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Pharmacophore Distance (Å)
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  -
  </td>
  
  <td>
  17β-estradiol
  </td>
  
  <td>
  -
  </td>
  
  <td>
  -10.5
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475 (Hydrogen)
  Glu 305
  (Hydrogen)
  Arg 346
  (Hydrogen)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.862
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  1
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Methyl 2-({[4-amino-6-(1-piperidinyl)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]methyl}
  sulfanyl)benzoate
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.5705
  </td>
  
  <td>
  -3.8
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475
  (Pi-Alkyl)
  Glu 305
  (Carbon)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  8.596
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  2
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N'',N'''''-(5-Methyl-2,4-pyrimidinediyl)
  dicarbonohydrazonic diamide
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.3745
  </td>
  
  <td>
  -7.1
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475 (Unfavorable)
  Arg 346 (Unfavorable)
  Glu 305
  (Salt Bridge)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  9.521
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  3
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N-{(E)-Amino[2-(1-hydrazono-2-propanylidene) hydrazino]methylene}acetamide
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.0311
  </td>
  
  <td>
  -3.6
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475
  (Unfavorable)
  Glu 305
  (Attractive Charge)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  6.649
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  4
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N-(4-Methyl-2-pentanyl)-N-phenyl-1,4-benzenediamine
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.2128
  </td>
  
  <td>
  -7.9
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475
  (Alkyl)
  Glu 305
  (Hydrogen)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.05
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  5
  </td>
  
  <td>
  7-(2-Methoxyethyl)-3-methyl-8-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-3,7-dihydro-1H-purine-2,6-dione
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.7608
  </td>
  
  <td>
  -4.5
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475
  (Pi-Alkyl)
  Glu 305
  (Hydrogen)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  7.898
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  6
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N-Cycloheptyl-2-methoxy-4-(methylsulfanyl)
  benzamide
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.3141
  </td>
  
  <td>
  -2.2
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475
  (Unfavorable)
  Arg 346
  (Sulfur)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  11.430
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  7
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Miserotoxin
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.7979
  </td>
  
  <td>
  -6.1
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475
  (Unfavorable)
  Glu305
  (Carbon)
  Arg 346
  (Hydrogen)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.377
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  8
  </td>
  
  <td>
  (2-Methyl-2H-tetrazol-5-yl)methyl carbamo
  hydrazonothioate
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.6768
  </td>
  
  <td>
  -5.3
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475
  (Unfavorable)
  Glu 305
  (Carbom)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  8.124
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  9
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2,2-Dioxido-3,6,9-trioxa-2λ6-thiaundecan-11-yl ethyl
  (2E)-2-butenedioate
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.7756
  </td>
  
  <td>
  -3.5
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475
  (Hydrogen)
  Arg 346
  (Hydrogen)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.887
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  10
  </td>
  
  <td>
  (-)-Metanephrine glucuronide
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.1558
  </td>
  
  <td>
  -2.8
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475
  (Hydrogen)
  Glu 305
  (Hydrogen)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.377
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  11
  </td>
  
  <td>
  3-(Ethylsulfonyl)-N-methyl-N-[3-(methylamino)propyl]-4-thiomorpholinesulfonamide
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.7356
  </td>
  
  <td>
  -5.6
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475
  (Hydrogen)
  Glu 305
  (Hydrogen)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  8.436
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  12
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2-{[4-Ethyl-5-(2-thienyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl]sulfanyl}-N-(2-methoxydibenzo[b,d]furan-3-yl)acetamide
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.4942
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.9
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475 (Unfavorable)
  Glu 305 (Unfavorable)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.936
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  13
  </td>
  
  <td>
  (1S,4S)-1,4-Dihydronaphthalene-1,4-diylbis(methylene)
  bis(4-methylbenzenesulfonate)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1.1176
  </td>
  
  <td>
  4
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475 (Hydrogen)
  Glu305 (Unfavorable)
  Arg 346 (Hydrogen)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  11.179
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  14
  </td>
  
  <td>
  3',5'-Di-O-acetyl-2'-deoxy-5-[3-(3-nitrophenyl)-4-oxo-1,3-thiazolidin-2-yl]uridine
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.4796
  </td>
  
  <td>
  20.1
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475 (Hydrogen)
  Glu 305 (Unfavorable)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.025
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  15
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1,5-Anhydro-2,6-bis-O-(3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoyl)
  -1-[2,4,6-trihydroxy-3-(4-hydroxybenzoyl)phenyl]hexitol
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.0409
  </td>
  
  <td>
  85.6
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475
  (Pi-Sigma)
  Glu 305 (Attractive charge)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.019
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  16
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Ethyl 3-(7-butoxy-6-chloro-4-methyl-2-oxo-2H-chromen-3-yl)propanoate
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.0231
  </td>
  
  <td>
  -4.5
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475
  (Hydrogen)
  Glu 305
  (Carbon)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.063
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  17
  </td>
  
  <td>
  3,4,5-Tris-O-[(2E)-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-propenoyl]-D-glucaric
  acid
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.5161
  </td>
  
  <td>
  20.4
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475 (Hydrogen)
  Glu 305 (Hydrogen)
  Arg 346 (Hydrogen)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  11.026
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  18
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N2-Acetyl-L-arginyl-L-valyl-L-lysyl-L-argininamide
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2.1360
  </td>
  
  <td>
  11.1
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475 (Unfavorable)
  Glu 305 (Hydrogen)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  10.268
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  19
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N-(3-Amino-3-methylbutanoyl)-O-methyl-L-tyrosyl-N-{(1R,2S)-3-cyclohexyl-1-[(5S)-3-ethyl-2-oxo-1,3-oxazolidin-5-yl]-1-hydroxy-2-propanyl}-3-(1,3-thiazol-4-yl)-L-alaninamide
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0.0803
  </td>
  
  <td>
  26.3
  </td>
  
  <td>
  His 475 (Unfavorable)
  Glu 305 (Hydrogen)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  12.6
  </td>
  
 </tr>
</table></table-wrap>

<p >The result of in
silico analysis showed that 19 compounds had the agonist characteristics
towards 3OLS protein, which meant that those compounds belonged to
phytoestrogen. To predict the compound potential as oral medicine, ERβ agonist
compounds were then selected using the SwissADME web tool to identify the
physicochemical properties of the compounds (The result of the SwissADME test
can be seen on https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6904891). The parameters
used in the physicochemical analysis were molecule weight &lt; 500 g/mol, HBD
(hydrogen binding donors) &lt; 5, HBA (hydrogen binding acceptors) &lt; 10,
TPSA ≤ 140 Å<bold>53</bold>, met Lipinski rule
of five<bold>54</bold>, and BBB permeant
"yes"<bold>55</bold>. The TPSA value
showed the compounds' capability to penetrate the cell membrane, and the BBB
permeant showed the compound's capability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier<bold>53</bold><bold>,</bold><bold>55</bold>. Lipinski's rule of
five was used to predict the similarity of compounds and medicine, which had a
specific biological activity designed for oral treatment<bold>53</bold>.</p><p >The analysis result
of the TPSA parameter found 11 compounds that met those criteria. Based on the
analysis of the Lipinski rule of five, it was found that 14 compounds met those
criteria. At the same time, the analysis result of the BBB permeant parameter
found that three compounds met those criteria. This indicates that these three
compounds may influence the CNS. Thus, the result of the physicochemical
analysis showed that three ERβ agonist compounds met all parameters: TPSA,
Lipinski rule of five, and BBB permeant, which can be seen in <bold>Table V</bold>.</p><p ><bold>Tab</bold><bold>le</bold><bold>V</bold><bold>.</bold> Agonist compound that met all
parameters of physicochemical analysis</p>

<table-wrap><label>Table</label><table>
 <tr>
  <td>
  No.
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Compound name
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Molecule weight (g/mol)
  </td>
  
  <td>
  HBD
  </td>
  
  <td>
  HBA
  </td>
  
  <td>
  BBB
  Permeant
  </td>
  
  <td>
  TPSA
  ≤ 140
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Lipinski
  Rule of 5
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  1.
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N-(4-Methyl-2-pentanyl)-N-phenyl-1,4-benzenediamine
  </td>
  
  <td>
  268.40
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Yes
  </td>
  
  <td>
  29.26
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Yes
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  2.
  </td>
  
  <td>
  N-Cycloheptyl-2-methoxy-4-(methylsulfanyl)benzamide
  </td>
  
  <td>
  293.42
  </td>
  
  <td>
  1
  </td>
  
  <td>
  2
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Yes
  </td>
  
  <td>
  63.63
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Yes
  </td>
  
 </tr>
 <tr>
  <td>
  3.
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Ethyl 3-(7-butoxy-6-chloro-4-methyl-2-oxo-2H-chromen-3-yl)propanoate
  </td>
  
  <td>
  366.84
  </td>
  
  <td>
  0
  </td>
  
  <td>
  5
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Yes
  </td>
  
  <td>
  65.74
  </td>
  
  <td>
  Yes
  </td>
  
 </tr>
</table></table-wrap>

<p >The result of the
physicochemical analysis above implied that those compounds were categorized as
phytoestrogen, which was indicated by the agonist interaction with 3OLS protein
and had the potential to be developed as antineuroinflammatory medicine given
orally, which was shown by meeting physicochemical analysis parameters<bold>56</bold><bold>,</bold><bold>57</bold>. The correlation of
these research findings was to prove that 96% ethanol extract of the controlled
environmental growth of M. crenata leaves had in vitro
antineuroinflammatory activity, which was shown by a significant decrease in
MHC II expression, and supported by the prediction of 19 secondary metabolite
compounds as the result of metabolite profiling on 96% ethanol extract of the
controlled environmental growth of M. crenata which had in silico
antineuroinflammatory activity and three of those compounds had the potential
to be developed as oral medicine. The correlation result showed that the use of
cultivated M. crenata had the advantage of decreasing MHC II expression
significantly and contained more active compounds because of external factors
control which could affect the compound content of the plant<bold>58</bold>.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>CONCLUSION</title>
				<p >The
96% ethanol extract of the environmental-controlled growth of M. crenata
has an antineuroinflammatory activity through MHC II expression inhibition on
HMC3 microglia cells, with an optimum concentration of 62.5 μg/mL and a value of
97.458 AU. This extract was predicted to contain 19 phytoestrogen compounds
with agonist characteristics on ERβ, and three met all parameters of
physicochemical analysis, including BBB permeant.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>ACKNOWLEDGMENT</title>
				<p >None.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION</title>
				<p >All authors have an
equal contribution in carrying out this study.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>DATA AVAILABILITY</title>
				<p >The result of the
SwissADME test can be seen on https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6904891.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>CONFLICT OF INTEREST</title>
				<p >The
authors declare there is no conflict of interest in this research.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>REFERENCES</title>
				<p >1. Kalhan M, Singhania K, Choudhary P, Verma S,
Kaushal P, Singh T. Prevalence of Menopausal Symptoms and its Effect on Quality
of Life among Rural Middle Aged Women (40-60 Years) of Haryana, India. Int J
Appl Basic Med Res. 2020;10(3):183-8. doi:10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_428_19</p><p >2. Webster AD, Finstad DA, Kurzer MS, Torkelson CJ.
Quality of life among postmenopausal women enrolled in the Minnesota Green Tea
Trial. Maturitas. 2018;108:1-6. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.10.013</p><p >3. Silva TR, Oppermann K, Reis FM, Spritzer PM. Nutrition
in Menopausal Women: A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2021;13(7):2149. doi:10.3390/nu13072149</p><p >4. Dalal PK, Agarwal M. Postmenopausal syndrome.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2015;57(Suppl 2):S222-32. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.161483</p><p >5. Kwon HS, Koh SH. Neuroinflammation in
neurodegenerative disorders: the roles of microglia and astrocytes. Transl Neurodegener.
2020;9(1):42. doi:10.1186/s40035-020-00221-2</p><p >6. Au A, Feher A, McPhee L, Jessa A, Oh S, Einstein
G. Estrogens, inflammation and cognition. Front Neuroendocrinol.
2016;40:87–100. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2016.01.002</p><p >7. Matt SM, Johnson RW. Neuro-immune dysfunction
during brain aging: new insights in microglial cell regulation. Curr Opin
Pharmacol. 2016;26:96–101. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2015.10.009</p><p >8. Arcuri C, Mecca C, Bianchi R, Giambanco I,
Donato R. The pathophysiological role of microglia in dynamic surveillance,
phagocytosis and structural remodeling of the developing CNS. Front Mol
Neurosci. 2017;10:191. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2017.00191</p><p >9. Prieto GA, Cotman CW. Cytokines and cytokine
networks target neurons to modulate long-term potentiation. Cytokine Growth
Factor Rev. 2017;34:27-33. doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2017.03.005</p><p >10. Radtke FA, Chapman G, Hall J, Syed YA.
Modulating neuroinflammation to treat neuropsychiatric disorders. Biomed Res
Int. 2017;2017:5071786. doi:10.1155/2017/5071786</p><p >11. Dong Y, Li X, Cheng J, Hou L. Drug development
for alzheimer’s disease: Microglia induced neuroinflammation as a target? Int J
Mol Sci. 2019;20(3):558. doi:10.3390/ijms20030558</p><p >12. Wixey JA, Reinebrant HE, Buller KM. Post-insult
ibuprofen treatment attenuates damage to the serotonergic system after
hypoxia-ischemia in the immature rat brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol.
2012;71(12):1137–48. doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e318277d4c7</p><p >13.
Garrido-Mesa N, Zarzuelo A, Gálvez J. Minocycline: Far beyond an
antibiotic. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;169(2):337–52. doi:10.1111/bph.12139</p><p >14. Zheng X, Yue P, Liu L, Tang C, Ma F, Zhang Y, et
al. Efficacy between low and high dose aspirin for the initial treatment of
Kawasaki disease: Current evidence based on a meta-analysis. PLoS One.
2019;14(5):e0217274. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217274</p><p >15. Rietjens IMCM, Louisse J, Beekmann K. The
potential health effects of dietary phytoestrogens. Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174(11):1263-80.
doi:10.1111/bph.13622</p><p >16. Jantaratnotai N, Utaisincharoen P, Sanvarinda P,
Thampithak A, Sanvarinda Y. Phytoestrogens mediated anti-inflammatory effect
through suppression of IRF-1 and pSTAT1 expressions in
lipopolysaccharide-activated microglia. Int Immunopharmacol. 2013;17(2):483–8.
doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2013.07.013</p><p >17. Villa A, Vegeto E, Poletti A, Maggi A.
Estrogens, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration. Endocr Rev.
2016;37(4):372–402. doi:10.1210/er.2016-1007</p><p >18. Ma’arif B, Fitri H, Saidah NL, Najib LA, Yuwafi
AH, Atmaja RRD, et al. Prediction of compounds with antiosteoporosis activity
in Chrysophyllum cainito L. leaves through in silico approach. J Basic Clin
Physiol Pharmacol. 2021;32(4):803–8. doi:10.1515/jbcpp-2020-0393</p><p >19. Desmawati D, Sulastri D. Phytoestrogens and
Their Health Effect. Open AccessMaced J Med Sci. 2019;7(3):495-9. doi:10.3889/oamjms.2019.044</p><p >20.
Liu T, Li N, Yan YQ, Liu Y, Xiong K, Liu Y, et al. Recent advances in
the anti-aging effects of phytoestrogens on collagen, water content, and
oxidative stress. Phytother Res. 2020;34(3):435-47. doi:10.1002/ptr.6538</p><p >21. Ma’arif B, Aditama AP. Activity of 96% Ethanol
Extract of Chrysophyllum Cainito L. in Increasing Vertebrae Trabecular
Osteoblast Cell Number in Male Mice. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2019;12(1):286-8.
doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2019.v12i1.28994</p><p >22. Agil M, Laswati H, Kuncoro H, Ma’arif B. In
silico Analysis of Phytochemical Compounds in Ethyl Acetate Fraction of
Semanggi (Marsilea crenata Presl.) Leaves As Neuroprotective Agent. Res J Pharm
Technol. 2020;13(8):3745–52. doi:10.5958/0974-360x.2020.00663.0</p><p >23. Putra HL. Green clover Potentiates Delaying the
Increment of Imbalance Bone Remodeling Process in Postmenopausal Women. Folia
Medica Indonesiana. 2011;47(2):112–7.</p><p >24. Nurjanah, Azka A, Abdullah A. Aktivitas
Antioksidan Dan Komponen Bioaktif Semanggi Air (Marsilea Crenata). Asian J
Innov Entrep. 2012;1(3):152–8. doi:10.20885/ajie.vol1.iss3.art2</p><p >25.
Ma ’arif B, Agil M, Laswati H. Phytochemical Assessment on N-Hexane
Extract and Fractions of Marsilea crenata Presl. Leaves through GC-MS. Trad Med
J. 2016;21(2):77–85. doi:10.22146/tradmedj.12821</p><p >26.
Ma’arif B, Agil M, Laswati H. Alkaline phosphatase activity of Marsilea
crenata Presl. extract and fractions as marker of MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cell
differentiation. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2018;8(3):55–9. doi:10.7324/JAPS.2018.8308</p><p >27. Ma’arif B, Mirza DM, Suryadinata A, Muchlisin
MA, Laswati H, Agil M. Metabolite Profiling of 96% Ethanol Extract from
Marsilea crenata Presl. Leaves Using UPLC-QToF-MS/MS and Anti-Neuroinflammatory
Predicition Activity with Molecular Docking. J Trop Pharm Chem.
2019;4(6):261–70. doi:10.25026/jtpc.v4i6.213</p><p >28. Ma’arif B, Agil M, Laswati H. The enhancement of
Arg1 and activated ERβ expression in microglia HMC3 by induction of 96% ethanol
extract of Marsilea crenata Presl. leaves. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol.
2019;30(6):20190284. doi:10.1515/jbcpp-2019-0284</p><p >29. Agil M, Kusumawati I, Purwitasari N. Phenotypic
Variation Profile of Marsilea crenata Presl. Cultivated in Water and in the
Soil. J Botany. 2017;2017:7232171. doi:10.1155/2017/7232171</p><p >30. Opačić N, Radman S, Uher SF, Benko B, Voća S,
Žlabur JŠ. Nettle Cultivation Practices-From Open Field to Modern Hydroponics:
A Case Study of Specialized Metabolites. Plants. 2022;11(4):483. doi:10.3390/plants11040483 </p><p >31.
Fussy A, Papenbrock J. An Overview of Soil and Soilless Cultivation
Techniques-Chances, Challenges and the Neglected Question of Sustainability.
Plants. 2022;11(9):1153. doi:10.3390/plants11091153</p><p >32.
Chen SL, Yu H, Luo HM, Wu Q, Li CF, Steinmetz A. Conservation and
sustainable use of medicinal plants: Problems, progress, and prospects. Chin
Med. 2016;11:37. doi:10.1186/s13020-016-0108-7</p><p >33. Ma’arif B, Suleman HF, Annisa R, Dianti MR,
Laswati H, Agil M. Efek Antineuroinflamasi Ekstrak Etanol 96% Daun Marsilea
crenata Presl. Budidaya Papda Sel Mikroglia HMC3. J Farmasi Udayana.
2020;9(2):91-9. doi:10.24843/JFU.2020.v09.i02.p04</p><p >34. Engler-Chiurazzi EB, Brown CM, Povroznik JM,
Simpkins JW. Estrogens as neuroprotectants: Estrogenic actions in the context
of cognitive aging and brain injury. Prog Neurobiol. 2017;157:188–211. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.12.008</p><p >35. Muchtaridi M, Dermawan D, Yusuf M. Molecular
docking, 3D structure-based pharmacophore modeling, and ADME prediction of
alpha mangostin and its derivatives against estrogen receptor alpha. J Young
Pharm. 2018;10(3):252–9. doi:10.5530/jyp.2018.10.58</p><p >36. Rettberg J, Yao J, Brnton R. Estrogen: A master
regulator of bioenergetic systems in the brain and body. Front Neuroendocrinol.
2014;35(1):515–25. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.08.001</p><p >37. Tang Y, Le W. Differential Roles of M1 and M2
Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53(2):1181–94.
doi:10.1007/s12035-014-9070-5</p><p >38. Papageorgiou IE, Lewen A, Galow LV, Cesetti T,
Scheffel J, Regen T, et al. TLR4-activated microglia require IFN-γ to induce
severe neuronal dysfunction and death in situ. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2016;113(1):212-7. doi:10.1073/pnas.1513853113</p><p >39. Cherry JD, Olschowka JA, O’Banion MK.
Neuroinflammation and M2 microglia: The good, the bad, and the inflamed. J
Neuroinflammation. 2014;11:98. doi:10.1186/1742-2094-11-98</p><p >40. Shih RH, Wang CY, Yang CM. NF-kappaB signaling
pathways in neurological inflammation: A mini review. Front Mol Neurosci.
2015;8:77. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2015.00077</p><p >41. Vandenberg LN, Colborn T, Hayes TB, Heindel JJ,
Jacobs DR, Lee DH, et al. Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Low-dose
effects and nonmonotonic dose responses. Endocr Rev. 2012;33(3):378–455. doi:10.1210/er.2011-1050</p><p >42. Lagarde F, Beausoleil C, Belcher SM, Belzunces
LP, Emond C, Guerbet M, et al. Non-monotonic dose-response relationships and
endocrine disruptors: A qualitative method of assessment. Environ Health.
2015;14:13. doi:10.1186/1476-069x-14-13</p><p >43. Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for
in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. J Pharm Anal.
2016;6(2):71–9. doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005</p><p >44. Lu J, Muhmood A, Czekała W, Mazurkiewicz J, Dach
J, Dong R. Untargeted metabolite profiling for screening bioactive compounds in
digestate of manure under anaerobic digestion. Water. 2019;11(11):2420. doi:10.3390/w11112420</p><p >45. Duarte AJ, Ribeiro D, Moreira L, Amaral O. In
silico analysis of missense mutations as a first step in functional studies:
Examples from two sphingolipidoses. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(11):3409. doi:10.3390/ijms19113409</p><p >46. Aditama APR, Ma’arif B, Mirza DM, Laswati H,
Agil M. In vitro and in silico analysis on the bone formation activity of
N-hexane fraction of Semanggi (Marsilea crenata Presl.). Syst Rev Pharm.
2020;11(11):837–49.</p><p >47. Kartika IGAA, Bang IJ, Riani C, Insanu M, Kwak
JH, Chung KH, et al. Isolation and Characterization of Phenylpropanoid and
Lignan Compounds from Peperomia pellucida [L.] Kunth with Estrogenic Activities.
Molecules. 2020;25(21):4914. doi:10.3390/molecules25214914</p><p >48. Pinto VdS, Araújo JSC, Silva RC, da Costa GV,
Cruz JN, Neto MFDA, et al. In silico study to identify new antituberculosis
molecules from natural sources by hierarchical virtual screening and molecular
dynamics simulations. Pharmaceuticals. 2019;12(1):36. doi:10.3390/ph12010036</p><p >49. Chen D, Oezguen N, Urvil P, Ferguson C, Dann SM,
Savidge TC. Regulation of protein-ligand binding affinity by hydrogen bond
pairing. Sci Adv. 2016;2(3):e1501240. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501240</p><p >50. Sellami A, Montes M, Lagarde N. Predicting
Potential Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Binding to Estrogen Receptor α (ERα)
Using a Pipeline Combining Structure-Based and Ligand-Based in Silico Methods.
Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(6):2846. doi:10.3390/ijms22062846 </p><p >51.
Vourinen A, Engeli R, Meyer A, Bachmann F, Griesser UJ, Schuster D, et
al. Ligand-based pharmacophore modeling and virtual screening for the discovery
of novel 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2 inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2014;57(14):5995-6007.
doi:10.1021/jm5004914</p><p >52. Kaserer T, Beck KR, Akram M, Odermatt A,
Schuster D. Pharmacophore Models and Pharmacophore-Based Virtual Screening:
Concepts and Applications Exemplified on Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases.
Molecules. 2015;20(12):22799-832. doi:10.3390/molecules201219880</p><p >53. Truong J, George A, Holien JK. Analysis of
physicochemical properties of protein-protein interaction modulators suggests
stronger alignment with the "rule of five". RSC Med Chem.
2021;12(10):1731-49. doi:10.1039/d1md00213a</p><p >54. Benet LZ, Hosey CM, Ursu O, Oprea TI. BDDCS, the
Rule of 5 and Drugability. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;101:89-98. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.05.007</p><p >55. Geldenhuys WJ, Mohammad AS, Adkins CE, Lockman
PR. Molecular determinants of blood-brain barrier permeation. Ther Deliv.
2015;6(8):961-71. doi:10.4155/tde.15.32</p><p >56. Daina A, Zoete V. A BOILED-Egg To Predict
Gastrointestinal Absorption and Brain Penetration of Small Molecules. ChemMedChem.
2016;11(11):1117–21. doi:10.1002/cmdc.201600182</p><p >57. Chagas CM, Moss S, Alisaraie L. Drug metabolites
and their effects on the development of adverse reactions: Revisiting
Lipinski’s Rule of Five. Int J Pharm. 2018;549(1–2):133–49. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.046 </p><p >58. Yang L, Wen KS, Ruan X, Zhao YX, Wei F, Wang Q.
Response of plant secondary metabolites to environmental factors. Molecules.
2018;23(4):762. doi:10.3390/molecules23040762 </p>
			</sec></body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <p>None.</p>
    </ack>
  </back>
</article>