Banjar Customary Law as a Living Law: An Ehrlichian Analysis of Consensus-Based Dispute Resolution and Social Restoration

Main Article Content

Rahmiati Rahmiati
Abdul Aziz Muslim
Khairunnisa
Gusti Muhammad Raja Putra Perdana

Abstract

This article examines the status of Banjar customary law as a living law and its potential integration into regional regulations in South Kalimantan using Eugen Ehrlich’s theory of the living law. This normative legal study employs a conceptual approach, a statutory approach, and document analysis of both national and regional regulations. The findings demonstrate that Banjar customary law fulfills the characteristics of a living law, possessing strong social legitimacy and functioning as a mechanism for dispute resolution grounded in deliberation and social restoration. Nonetheless, its integration into the formal legal system faces challenges, including the absence of a regional recognition regulation (Perda Rekognisi), the lack of limited codification, and normative disharmony between customary law and state law. This study proposes an integration model based on recognition-oriented regional regulations, limited codification, and synergy with the national restorative justice framework. The findings contribute conceptually to strengthening legal pluralism in Indonesia and formulating regionally responsive policies rooted in local values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahmiati, R., Muslim, A. A., Khairunnisa, & Perdana, G. M. R. P. (2026). Banjar Customary Law as a Living Law: An Ehrlichian Analysis of Consensus-Based Dispute Resolution and Social Restoration. Anterior Jurnal, 25(1), 189–191. Retrieved from https://journal.umpr.ac.id/index.php/anterior/article/view/12051
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Rahmiati Rahmiati, Universitas Borneo Lestari

Universitas Borneo Lestari

Abdul Aziz Muslim, Universitas Borneo Lestari

Universitas Borneo Lestari

Khairunnisa, Universitas Borneo Lestari

Universitas Borneo Lestari

Gusti Muhammad Raja Putra Perdana, Universitas Borneo Lestari

Universitas Borneo Lestari

References

Asshiddiqie, J. (2017). Konstitusi dan Masyarakat Adat di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Aziz, M. (2022). Hukum Adat dalam Kebijakan Pemerintah Daerah: Studi Peraturan Daerah Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Banjarmasin: Lambung Mangkurat Press.

Ehrlich, E. (1936). Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Harvard University Press.

Griffiths, J. (1986). What is Legal Pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism, 24(1), 1–55.

Khairunnisa, Perdana, G. M. R. P., Rahmiati, Muslim, A. A., & Radini, M. (2025). Efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa hukum berbasis kearifan lokal budaya hukum adat Badamai daerah Kalimantan Selatan. Wijaya Putra Law Review, 4(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.38156/wplr.v4i2.323

Mahyuni, A. (2021). Struktur Sosial dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Adat Banjar. Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, 42(2), 115–130.

Rahman, F. (2020). Musyawarah dan Rekonsiliasi dalam Adat Banjar. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 18(3), 233–249.

Soetandyo, W. (2019). Pluralisme Hukum dan Sosiologi Hukum. Jakarta: Obor.

UUD 1945.

UU No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa.

UU No. 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.

Peraturan Kepolisian RI No. 10 Tahun 2022 tentang Restorative Justice.

Most read articles by the same author(s)