Effect of Hyflex Learning on Student's Academic Performance in Education Technology in Kwara State

Authors

  • Abdu Danyaro University of Ilorin, Nigeria
  • Justina Ojoma Attah University of Ilorin, Nigeria
  • Bolanle Hafsat Sallah University of Ilorin, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33084/ijue.v2i1.7510

Keywords:

Hyflex Learning, Student's Academic Performance, Educational Technology

Abstract

The study examined the effect of Hyflex learning on Student's Academic Performance in Education Technology in Kwara State. The study was guided by two research questions and two null hypotheses were postulated for the study. The study adopted a quasi-experimental research design of 2 x 2 factorial design. The target population were all 400-level undergraduate students in the Department of Educational Technology offering EDT 412. A sample size of 152 undergraduate students participated in the study. Two groups were involved in the study which are both intact classes.  The experimental group where full-time undergraduates’ students while the control group were sandwich undergraduates’ students. The instrument used for data collection was an educational technology performance test which was validated by three educational technology experts. Descriptive statistics of mean and standard deviation were used to answer the research questions while inferential statistics of t-test were used to analyse the research hypothesis. The findings of the study revealed that Hyflex learning effectively improved the performance of undergraduate students in education technology. Both male and female undergraduate students in the experimental group performed better than their counterparts in the control group, though the male students had a higher mean score than their female counterparts. There is a significant difference between the mean post-test score of students taught educational technology using Hyflex learning relative to their counterparts taught using the lecture method and there is a significant interaction effect of gender on the mean scores of students in the experimental group. It was therefore recommended among others that institutions should adopt hyflex learning as a pedagogy because it offers flexible learning opportunities among undergraduate students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Abdu Danyaro, University of Ilorin, Nigeria

Justina Ojoma Attah, University of Ilorin, Nigeria

Bolanle Hafsat Sallah, University of Ilorin, Nigeria

References

Abdelmalak, M. M., & Parra, J. L. (2016). Expanding learning opportunities for graduate students with HyFlex course design. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD, 6(4), 19-37.

Bakach, B. (2021). Investigating the Hyflex Modality: Students’ Satisfaction and Impact on Learning. PhD Dissertation in Learning, Design and Technology University of Houston.

Beatty, B. J. (2019). Hybrid-Flexible Course Design (1st Ed.). EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex

Hajara, U. S., & Mustapha, H. K. (2013). Gender and Information and Communication Technologies (ICTS) in Nigeria: Challenges and Prospects. Global Journal of Human Social Science, sociology and culture 13 (6), 51-58.

Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2021). Adopting HyFlex in higher education in response to COVID-19: students’ perspectives. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(3), 231-244. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1906641

Koskinen, M. (2018). Understanding the Needs of Adult Graduate Students: An Exploratory Case Study of a Hyflex Learning Environment. PhD thesis College of Professional Studies Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts.

Kyei-Blankson, L., Godwyll, F., & Nur-Awaleh, M. A. (2014). Innovative blended delivery and learning: Exploring student choice, experience, and level of satisfaction in a Hyflex course. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 16(3), 243-252.

Lakhal, S., Khechine, H., & Pascot, D. (2014). Academic students’ satisfaction and learning outcomes in a Hyflex course: Do delivery modes matter? World Conference on E-Learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (E-Learn), 1075-1083.

Malczyk, B. R. (2019). Introducing Social Work to HyFlex Blended Learning: A Student-Centered Approach. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 39(4/5), 414–428.

Mentzer, N. J., Isabell, T. M., & Mohandas, L. (2023). The impact of interactive synchronous HyFlex model on student academic performance in a large active learning introductory college design course. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1-28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09369-y

Miller, J. B., Risser, M. D., & Griffiths, R. P. (2013). Student choice, instructor flexibility: Moving beyond the blended instructional model. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 1(1), 8-24.

Parra, J., & Abdelmalak, M. (2016). Expanding Learning Opportunities for Graduate Students with HyFlex Course Design. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 6(1), 19–37.

Penrod, J. (2022, March 25). Staying Relevant: The Importance of Incorporating HyFlex Learning into Higher Education Strategy. Retrieved from EDUCAUSE Review: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2022/3/staying-relevant-the-importance-of-incorporating-hyflex-learning-into-higher-education-strategy

Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600.

Thurnau, L. (2022). HyFlex: A hybrid model providing flexibility for learners. C2C Digital Magazine Spring-Summer 2022.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-29

How to Cite

Danyaro, A., Attah, J. O. ., & Sallah, B. H. . (2024). Effect of Hyflex Learning on Student’s Academic Performance in Education Technology in Kwara State. International Journal of Universal Education, 2(1), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.33084/ijue.v2i1.7510