Persepsi Masyarakat Dalam Program Kota Tanpa Kumuh (KOTAKU) Di Kawasan Kelurahan Pahandut Kota Palangka Raya
Perception of Communities in The City Without Slum Program (KotaKu) in the Pahandut Urban Area Palangka Raya City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33084/pencerah.v8i1.2265Keywords:
Program, Perception, SocietyAbstract
This study aims to determine the Community Perceptions in the City without Slums Program (KotaKu) in the Pahandut Urban Area Palangkaraya City. The method used is qualitative. The researcher wants to describe the Community Perception in the City without Slums Program (KotaKu) in the Pahandut Urban Area of Palangka Raya City by using 5 (five) performance indicators, namely Stimulation, Organization, Interpretation-evaluation, Memory, and Recall. The data source consisted of primary data, namely the results of interviews with 2 officials of the City Coordinator of the City of My City and the Acting Housing and Settlement Areas and 5 community members who received the KotaKu Program in the Pahandut Kelurahan, while the secondary data source was the SK Palangka Raya Mayor Document Number 188.45 / 130/2016 and Pahandut Village basline data.
The results showed that the Community Perception in the City without Slums Program (KotaKu) in the Pahandut Kelurahan of Palangka Raya City that the facilities provided to the community could not be used optimally in accordance with their functions and lack of public awareness that the slum was a problem they had to solve itself, the government is only a tool to help provide the facilities they need for these problems. Cause this program is less than optimal even though the government has done its job well, because the impelamator of this program is the community itself. The program will be said to be successful if the facilities built can be used by the community. Suggestions from researchers provide regular outreach to the community, with the aim to change the community mindset that is the main problem of this program. Not only socialization, the government should continue to evaluate and remind that this function continues to work by the Working Group.
Downloads
References
Aw Suranto. (2011). Komunikasi Interpersonal. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu
Devito, Joseph, A. (1997). Ilmu Komunikasi Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Hamka. (2002). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineko Cipta
Kotler, Philip. (2000). Manajemen Pemasaran. Jakarta: PT. Prenhallindo
Muhyadi. (2012). Dinamika Organisasi Konsep Dan Aplikasinya Dalam Interaksi Sosial. Yogyakarta : Ombak
Nasution,Zulkarimen. (2007). Komunikasi Pembangunan Pengenalan Teori dan Penerapannya. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
P. Robbins, Stephen. (2006). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta:PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia
Rakhmad, Jamalludin. (1996). Psikologi komunikasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Sobur, Alex. (2003). Psikologi Umum. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Sugihartono, dkk. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press
Sugiono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif. Bandung : Alfabeta Vc
Sukoco, Dwi Heru. (1995). Profesi Pekerjaan Sosial dan Proses Pertolonganya. Bandung : Koperasi Mahasiswa STKS Bandung
Thoha, Miftha. (2007). Perilaku Organisasi Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasi. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Tjokroamidjoyo, Bibtoro. (1996). Perencanaan Pembangunan. Gunung Agung : Jakarta
Triana, Cepi. (2016). Perilaku Organisasi Dalam Pendidikan. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Walgito, Bimo. (2010). Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta : CV ANDI OFFSET
Walgito, Bimo. (1990). Pengantar Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru, Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Wibhawa, Budhi. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Pekerjaan Sosial. Bandung : Widya Padjajaran.
B.Sangen Roland. (2015). Evaluasi Pembangunan Dibidang Intrastruktur Dikabupaten Kutai Timur Pasca Pemekaran Daerah. Jurnal : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Negara FISIP UNMUL.
Haryadi, Budi. (2016). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Program Corporate Social Responsibility BI Coerner Yogyakarta.Skripsi : Universitas Islam Negrai Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Rambe, A. (2004). Alokasi Pengeluaran Rumah tangga dan Tingkat Kesejahteraan (Kasus di Kecamatan Medan,Kota Suamtra Utara). Tesis. Pacasarjana IPB, Bogor
Rosin. Analisis Tingkat Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Nelayan Didesa Daharin Selebar Kecamatan Talawi Kabupaten Batubara. Jurnal : universitas Negeri Medan.
Suhanda, Faisal. (2016). Skripsi “Peranandinas Pekerjaan Umum (Pu) Kabupaten Mesuji Dalam Pembangunan Infrastruktur Jalan
S.Priadana, Teguh. (2016). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Fasilitas Publik. Skirpsi : Universitas Jember
Zulyanti, Dewi. (2017). Implementasi Program KOTAKU (Kota Tanpa Kumuh) Sebagai Model Pembangunan Infratruktur Berbasis Masyarakat Bandar Lampung. Skripsi : Universitas Islam Negeri Reden Intan Lampung.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording.
