Efektifitas Penerapan Platform LMS Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Bahasa Inggris: Effectiveness of LMS Platform Implementation To Improve English Learning Outcomes

A'am Rifaldi Khunaifi; Arif Supriyadi

doi:10.33084/bitnet.v7i2.4062

Authors

A'am Rifaldi Khunaifi Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya
Arif Supriyadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33084/bitnet.v7i2.4062

Keywords:

LMS, Sevima Edlink, Bahasa Inggris

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektifitas LMS menggunakan Sevima Edlink dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar Bahasa Inggris. Penelitian ini menggunakan Quasi Eksperimental Design (Eksperimen Semu). Desain yang digunakan adalah Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 60 mahasisiwa di FKIP UM Palangkaraya yang dibagi menjadi 30 subjek untuk kelompok control dan 30 subjek untuk kelompok eksperimen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan hasil postest antara kelompok control dan kelompok eskperimen dimana hasil postest pada kelompok eksperimen lebih baik dari pada kelompok kontrol berdasarkan uji t yang dilakukan diperoleh nilai t-hitung sebesar 4,47 yang ternyata nilai tersebut lebih besar dari nilai t-tabel 5% yaitu 1,672. Dengan demikian berarti pada hasil posttest terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara kelompok eksperimen dan kelompok control.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

A'am Rifaldi Khunaifi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Arif Supriyadi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

References

Alfadly, A. A. (2013). The efficiency of the “learning management system (LMS)” in AOU, Kuwait, as a communication tool in an e-learning system. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(2), 157–169. doi:10.1108/09513541311297577
Almarashdeh, I. (2016). Sharing instructors experience of learning management system: A technology perspective of user satisfaction in distance learning course. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 249–255. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.013
Cavus, N. (2015). Distance learning and learning management systems. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 872–877. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.611
Cheng, Y. M. (2012). Effects of quality antecedents on e-learning acceptance. Internet Research, 22(3), 361–390. doi:10.1108/10662241211235699
Chipps, J., Kerr, J., Brysiewicz, P., & Walters, F. (2015). A survey of university students’ perceptions of learning management systems in a low-resource setting using a technology acceptance model. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 33(2), 71–77.
Islam, N., & Azad, N. (2015). Satisfaction and continuance with a learning management system: Comparing perceptions of educators and students. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 32(2), 109–123. doi:10.1108/IJILT-09- 2014-0020
Kattoua, Tagreed, Musa Al-Lozi, and Ala’aldin Alrowwad. 2016. “A Review of Literature on E-Learning Systems in Higher Education.” International Journal of Business Management & Economic Research 7 (5): 754–762.
Laflen, A., & Smith, M. (2017). Responding to student writing online: Tracking student interactions with instructor feedback in a learning management System. Assessing Writing, 31, 39–52. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.003
Liew, T., & Teoh, A. (2012). Assuring the quality of online teaching and learning: The case of Wawasan Open University. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 7(1), 13–33. doi:10.1108/AAOUJ-07-01-2012-B002
Literature Review.” Paper presented at the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 387–393. Wollongong, December 4–7.
Porter, G. W. (2013). Free choice of learning management systems: Do student habits override inherent system quality? Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 10(2), 84–94. doi:10.1108/ITSE-07-2012-0019
Poulova, P., Simonova, I., & Manenova, M. (2015). Which one, or another? Comparative analysis of selected LMS. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 1302–1308. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.052
Sabharwal, R., M. R. Hossain, R. Chugh, and M. Wells. 2018. “Learning Management Systems in the Workplace: A L
Salahudin Permadi, A., & Anugrah Putra, C. (2022). Pengaruh Pair Recording Method Dan Audio Lingual Method Terhadap Hasil Belajar Bahasa Inggris. Neraca: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 7(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.33084/neraca.v7i2.3557
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012),
Turnbull, Darren, Ritesh Chugh, and Jo Luck. 2019. “Learning Management Systems: An Overview.” In Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies, edited by A. Tatnall. Cham: Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60013- 0_248-1.
Walker, D. S., Lindner, J. R., Murphrey, T. P., & Dooley, K. (2016). Learning management system usage: Perspectives from university instructors. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(2), 41–50.