Analisis Perbandingan Sifat Fisika dan Mekanika Papan Laminasi Kayu Jati Putih (Gmelina arborea. Roxb) dan Papan Lamninasi Bambu Petung (Dendrocalamus asper)

Comparison Analysis of Physical and Mechanical Properties of White Teak Wood (Gmelina arborea. Roxb) Laminate Board and Petung Bamboo (Dendrocalamus asper) Lamniation Board

Authors

  • Febriana Tri Wulandari Universitas Mataram
  • I Gde Dharma Atmaja Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33084/daun.v9i2.4186

Keywords:

laminated board, white teak wood, physical and mechanical properties

Abstract

This study of laminated boards wants to compare laminated boards made of wood and non-wood raw materials. For wood, use white teak (Gmelina arborea. Roxb) and non-wood using petung bamboo (Dendrocalamus asper). Teak wood is easy to work either by machine or by hand. It has an average fiber length of 1.32 mm with a diameter of 24.8 μm. Teak wood is included in durable class 1 and strong class II, has a fairly good nail resistance and can withstand rust with the age of an old tree. Petung bamboo has a diameter that can reach 20 cm with a wall thickness of 1-3 cm, making it suitable for use as laminated bamboo. To see the difference in strength of the two boards, it is necessary to test the physical and mechanical properties. The purpose of this study is to compare the strength of the physical and mechanical properties of laminated boards made of wood and non-wood so that they can provide recommendations according to their use. The test values for physical and mechanical properties of white teak laminated boards and petung bamboo laminated boards showed no significant difference. All tests of physical and mechanical properties have met the standard except for the thickness shrinkage test for white teak laminated boards which did not meet the standards. Based on the value of testing the physical and mechanical properties, the laminated boards of white teak and petung bamboo are included in the strong class III which can be used for indoor construction materials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Belatrix. 2022. Analisis Sifat Fisika Dan Mekanika Papan Laminasi Kombinasi Bambu Petung Dan Bambu Ater. Jurnal Inersia, 18(1), 1–8.

Fakhri. 2002. Kemampuan Perekat Resin Urea Formaldehyde Pada Laminasi Kayu Sengon Dan Keruing. Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi Universitas Riau.

Ginting, D. A. R. 2012. Balok Laminasi dengan Kombinasi dari Batang Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) dan Kayu Mahoni (Swetenia mahagoni). Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Gusmawati, E. 2018. Sifat Fisika dan Mekanika Papan Laminasi Berdasarkan Warna Bidang Orientasi Kayu. Universitas Mataram.

Hanafiah, K. 2016. Rancangan Percobaan. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Herawati, E., Massijaya, M. ., & Nugroho, N. 2008. Karakteristik Balok Laminasi Dari Kayu Mangium (Acacia Mangium Willd.). Jurnal Ilmu Dan Teknologi Hasil Hutan, 1, 1–8.

Islamiati, D. 2021. Sifat Fisika Glulam Dari Potongan Kayu Rajumas (Duabang Mollucana). Universitas Mataram.

Kasmudjo. 2001. Pengantar Teknologi Hasil Hutan Bagian V Papan Tiruan Lain. Yayasan Pembina Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Gadja Mada.

Morisco. 2006. Bamboo Technology. Gadjah Mada University.

Prihandini, F. D. 2012. Asymmetrical Laminated Wood as Partition Wall Components. Bogor Agricultural Institute.

Purwanto, D. 2011. Pembuatan Balok Dan Papan Dari Limbah Industri Kayu. Balai Riset Dan Standardisasi Industri Banjarbaru. Jurnal Riset Industri, 5, 13–20.

Rachmad, S. 2013. Sifat Fisika Dan Mekanika Papan Laminasi Silang Kayu Mindi (Melia Azedarach Linn) Menggunakan Perekat Isosianat. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Risnasari, Iwan, Azhar, I., & Sitompul, A. N. 2012. Karakteristik Balok Laminasi dari Batang Kelapa (Cocos nucifera L.) dan Kayu Kemiri (Aleurites moluccana wild.). FORESTA Indonesian Journal of Forestry, 1(2), 79–87.

Sailana, G. E., Usman, F. H., & Yani, A. 2014. Physical and mechanical properties of mahang wood (Macaranga hypoleuca (reichb.f.et zoll.)m.a) are densification by steam time and temperatur felts. Jurnal Hutan Lestari, 2, 1–10.

Somadona, Sonia, Sribudiani, E., & Valencia, D. E. 2020. Karakteristik Balok Laminasi Kayu Akasia (Acacia mangium) dan Meranti Merah (Shorea leprosula) berdasarkan Susunan Lamina dan Berat Labur Perekat Styrofoam. Wahana Forestra, 15(2), 53–64.

Sucipto, T. 2009. Stabilitas Dimensi kayu. Universitas Sumatra Utara.

Violet, & Agustina. 2018. Variasi Arah Aksial Batang (Pangkal Dan Ujung) Terhadap Sifat Mekanika Papan Laminasi Kayu Kelapa (Cocos Nucifera.L) Dan Kayu Nangka (Arthocarpus Heterophyllus.L). Jurnal Hutan Tropis , 6(1).

Widyawati, R. 2010. Kekuatan Sambungan Tegak (Butt Joint) Struktur Balok Laminasi (Glulam Beams) dari Kayu Lokal. Jurnal Rekayasa, 14, 28–38.

Wulandari, F. T. 2022. Pengaruh Berat Labur Perekat Terhadap Sifat Fisika Danmekanika Papan Laminasi Jati Putih (Gmelina Arborea Roxb). Jurnal Media Bina Ilmiah, 16(9).

Wulandari, F. T., & Latifah, S. 2021. Laminated board Limbah Potongan Kayu Sebagai Bahan Substitusi Kayu Solid.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-27

How to Cite

Wulandari, F. T., & Atmaja, I. G. D. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan Sifat Fisika dan Mekanika Papan Laminasi Kayu Jati Putih (Gmelina arborea. Roxb) dan Papan Lamninasi Bambu Petung (Dendrocalamus asper): Comparison Analysis of Physical and Mechanical Properties of White Teak Wood (Gmelina arborea. Roxb) Laminate Board and Petung Bamboo (Dendrocalamus asper) Lamniation Board. Daun: Jurnal Ilmiah Pertanian Dan Kehutanan, 9(2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.33084/daun.v9i2.4186