Customary Payments and the Recognition of “Anak Jantan” and “Anak Betino” in Koto Petai, Kerinci: An Empirical Analysis of Maslahah Mursalah

Main Article Content

Ghina Nadiah
Khoirul Hidayah
Aunul Hakim
Ahmad Rais

Abstract

This study examines the determination of “anak jantan” and “anak betino” status through customary payments within the context of marriage in the community of Koto Petai Village, Kerinci Regency. The research aims to analyze the mechanisms for establishing this status, its legal implications, and its benefits through the lens of the Islamic legal principle of maslahah mursalah. Employing an empirical legal research method with a sociology-of-law approach, data were gathered through interviews with customary leaders, village officials, and community members, and subsequently analyzed qualitatively in relation to the research focus and the theory of maslahah mursalah. The findings indicate that: (1) the determination of status is achieved by fulfilling customary requirements, carrying out the pno by the sepengkalan, and obtaining formal recognition from the Ninik Mamak; (2) this status grants the couple a recognized position within the wife’s kinship group kelebu, enables their participation in customary and social life, and entails an obligation to adhere to customary regulations; and (3) the practice serves the public interest maslahah by providing clarity regarding a couple’s standing, ensuring orderly kinship relations, and sustaining customary institutions. This study clarifies the interplay between customary payments, the recognition of social status, and the promotion of public welfare within the customary marriage practices of the Kerinci community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nadiah, G., Hidayah, K., Hakim, A., & Rais, A. (2026). Customary Payments and the Recognition of “Anak Jantan” and “Anak Betino” in Koto Petai, Kerinci: An Empirical Analysis of Maslahah Mursalah. Jurnal Hadratul Madaniyah, 13(3), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.33084/jhm.v13i3.14559
Section
Articles

References

Ahmad Madani, Rembrandt, Y. (2025). The Legal Status of Keduhei Customary in Marriages in the Sebukar Village Community, Kerinci Regency. 25(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32939/islamika.v25i1.4950

Aini, U. M. (2024). Views on inter-ethnic marriage in society. 1, 152–173. https://jim.ar-raniry.ac.id/jupsi

Amor Seta Gilang Pratama, Mavil Tomi, D. R. (2022). Gong Betino and Gong Jantan: Gender Constuction in Kerinci Bamboo Gong Musical Instrument .22(2), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.33153/keteg.v22i2.4673

Annisa Dea Mudrika, Novia Astari, Y. D. S. (2023). Marriage in Gayo Custom: Tradition and Culture. 3(2), 50–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57251/hij.v3i2.1465

Annisa, M. F. (2026). Obligations of a Partner. wawancara.

Ansori, A. (2025). Integration of Islamic Jurisprudence and Minangkabau Customary Law in a Modern Context: The Role of Ninik Mamak According to Community Perception.14(3), 178–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30651/mqsd.v14i3.27903

Arif, M. (2026). Mechanism for Determining the Status of “anak jantan” and “anak betino. wawancara.

Dafizki, A. M., & , Edi Rosman, B. (2023). The Budendo Pelaky Nikah Tradition Contributes to the Perspective of the Sociology of Islamic Law 1(2), 140–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30983/usraty.v1i2.7530

Fachry Rizki Andy La Rante, F. G. (2026). A Review of the 'Urf' on the Tradition of Paying 20 Goats Before Marriage in Koto Iman Village, Kerinci Regency. 7(1), 185–198. https://ejurnals.com/ojs/index.php/jahk/article/view/4852

Fidlilal, M., Rakhmat, I., Farudin, M., & Priluckito, S. D. (2025). Analysis of Customary Marriage Law of the Pulau Buaya Village Community, Alor in the Customary Kinship System from an Islamic Law PerspectivIslam. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v2i1.480

Haifa, N. M., Nabilla, I., Rahmatika, V., & Hidayatullah, R. (2025). Identification of Research Variables, Types of Data Sources in Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62383/dilan.v2i2.1563

Husni, M., Pakarti, A., Solehudin, E., Saujan, I., & Shakibiciu, S. (2025). The Role and Application of ’ Urf as a Source of Islamic Law : A Historical Review and Fiqhiyah Rules. 2(September), 175–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.63142/an-nisa.v2i3.300

Irsyad Al Fikri Ys, A. F. (2025). The Role of Maslahah Mursalah in Contemporary Islamic Legislation: School Analysis and Policy Implications 3. https://doi.org/10.15575/ejil.v3i2.1936

Itmamiy, A. L., Ekonomi, H., & Hasan, Z. (2022). Maslahah Theory in Islamic Economics ( FIqh Muamalah ). 4(2), 65–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55606/ai.v4i2.379

Juniarti, Y. (2022). A Analysis of Interfaith Marriage Registration in Indonesia according to Law 1974. 1, 71–76.

Mufadhol, A. T., & Nuraeni, N. (2025). The Istinbath Ahkam Method in Solving Contemporary Problems : Case Study on Fatwa and Ijtihad .3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16935179

Muh. Adistira Hidayat, U. S. (n.d.). Maslahah Mursalah and Its Application in Family Law 5, 45–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52431/minhaj.v5i1.2233

Pajri, A., & Fitrah, Y. (2023). Character Education Values in the Traditional Marriage Tradition and the Perceptions of the Tigo Luhah Semurup Kerinci Community : A Study of the Sociology of Literature 13(2), 713–723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23969/literasi.v13i2.8117

Putri, E. A. (2021). The Validity of Marriage Based on a Positive Legal Perspective in Indonesia. 15(1), 151–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v15i1.541

Quran.nu. (n.d.). Al-Anbiya Ayat 107. https://quran.nu.or.id/al-anbiya/107

Raden, M. (2026). Customary Money, wawancara.

Sholehudin, M. (2025). Legall Research Methodology (p. 43).

Sinta, T. (2023). The Significanse of Al-Ghazaali’s Maslahah Concept to the Development of Usul Fiqh And Islamic Law. 15(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37252/annur.v15i1.444

Sofwan. (2026). Acceptance of a Spouse as a Village Resident. wawancara.

Sumarna, D., & Kadriah, A. (2023). Qualitative Research on Empirical Law. 16(02), 101–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v16i02.730

Suyaman, P. (2024). Maslahah Mursalah as One of the Istinbath Methods. 18(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v18i2.2692

Syaparudin. (2017). Islamic Microeconomics: Caring for the Public Interest vs. Not Caring for the Public Interest

Undari Sulung, M. M. (2024). Understanding Research Data Sources : Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary. 5(September), 110–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47827/jer.v5i3.238