Kajian Optimalisasi Pemanfaatan Csr Untuk Kegiatan Produktif Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah: Optimization Review Of CSR Utilization For Productive Activities In Efforts To Improve People's Welfare In Central Kalimantan Province

Muhamad Yusuf; Raden Biroum Bernandianto; Farid Zaky Yopiannor; Muhammad Jailani

doi:10.33084/restorica.v4i1.978

Authors

Muhamad Yusuf Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya
Raden Biroum Bernandianto Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya
Farid Zaky Yopiannor Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya
Muhammad Jailani Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33084/restorica.v4i1.978

Keywords:

Study, Optimization, Social responsibility, Community Welfare

Abstract

This research aims to families the optimization of CSR for productive activities in the effort to increase the Community's welfare in the province of Central Kalimantan. This study is done because Pemerinah aware will not be able to finance all development activities with the economic growth that is not maximized. That is the increase of government and private cooperation that is more systematic and sustainable need to be flown and optimized for misalignment through the scheme of fund-raising of Corporate Social responsibility (CSR).

This study uses a qualitative method approach that is supported by quantitative data. The qualitative approach is assumed to be relevant to capture the entire stakeholder's view of CSR. The study will take East Kotawarakan regency as the object of study. East Kotawarwants Regency already has a Perda that regulates CSR and institutional of CSR Forum. The selection of the object of this study is also based on some practical considerations related to the potential availability and access to data and many of the companies in the East Kotawarwants regency in the Central Kalimantan provincial government environment.

The results of this study showed the CSR policy by the East Kotawarwants District government in the implementation of weak. This is due to the lack of understanding between stakeholders in understanding good and sustainable CSR governance. The mandate from local regulation No. 21, 2014 Regency of Kotawarwant Timut about CSR is the establishment of CSR Forum. However, in its journey, the CSR forums have not been able to move flexibly due to limited employment and budget programs. So that the CSR Forum until now can not optimally bridge the government with the company related to the governance of the CSR program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Muhamad Yusuf, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

References

Astri, H. 2012. The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility Toward the Improvement of Quality of Life in Indonesia. Pusat Pengkajian, Pengolahan Data dan Informasi (P3DI) Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI.
Azheri, B. 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility: Dari Voluntary Menjadi Mandatory. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Bank, W. 2006. From Curse to Blessing Natural Resources and Institutional Quality. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Dahlsrud, A. 2008. How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management No. 15.
Epstein, M. J. 2008. Making Sustainability Work Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental and Economic Impact. Green Leaf Publishing.
Fox, T. 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility and Development: In the quest of an agenda development, 47 (3). 29-36.
Jalal. 2011. Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, Corporate Social Responsibility dan Pengembangan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Lingkar Study CSR Indonesia.
Kiroyan, N. 2009. CSR Compliance and Business Opportunities. Materi presentasi disampaikan pada pertemuan Amerika Chamber in Indonesia.
Kotler, P., & Nancy, L. 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility, Doing the most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. Canada: John Willey & Sons Inc.
Moon, J., & Vogel, D. 2009. Corporate Social Responsibility, Government and Civil Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
O'Riordan, Fairbrass, L., & Jenny. 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Models and Theories in Stakeholder Dialogue. Paper Presentation In Corporate Responsibility Research Conference.
Prajarto, N., & Radityo, M. 2012. Lihatlah CSR-nya. Yogyakarta: FISIPOL UGM.
Radyati, M. 2008. CSR Untuk Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Lokal. Jakarta: Indonesia Business Links.
Sachs, J., & Warner. 2001. The Curse of Natural Resources. European Economic Review, 45 (4-6), 827-838.
Saidi, Z., & Abidin, H. 2004. Menjadi Bangsa Pemurah: Wacana dan Praktek Kedermawanan Sosial di Indonesia. Jakarta: Piramedia.
Steurer, R. 2010. The Role of Governments in Corporate Social Responsibility: Characterising Public Policies on CSR in Europe. Institute of Forest, Environmental and Natural Resource Policy, Discussion Paper 2-2010.
Suharto, E. 2006. Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Rakyat: Kaiam Strategis Pembangunan Kesejahteraan Sosial dan Pekerja Sosial. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Tania, S. 2012. Corporate Social Responsibility di Indonesia: Prinsip dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: FISIPOL UGM.
Visser, W. 2010. CSR 2.0 and the New DNA of Business. Journal of Business Systems, Governmence and Ethics Vol. 5, No. 3, 7.
Visser, W. 2011. The Age of Responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the new DNA of Business. Journal of Business System.
Wibisono, Y. 2007. Membedah Konsep dan Aplikasi CSR. Gresik: Fascho Publishing.