The Relationship Of Self-Confidence And Self-Esteem To The Results Of Objective Value Of Structured Clinical Examination (Osce) In Students Of The Faculty Of Medicine, Muhammadiyah Makassar University
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research is an analytical observational research method with a quantitative design and the method for collecting research data is a Cross Sectional Study, in this case to determine the relationship between the independent variables (Self Confidence and Self Esteem) and the dependent variable (Objective Structured Clinical Examination scores). The data taken is primary data to measure the level of Self-Confidence and Self-Esteem and secondary data to determine the results of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores. The research sample consisted of 73 students selected through purposive sampling. Research Results: A total of (91.8%) had high self-confidence, (8.2%) of respondents who had moderate self-confidence were in the high category. The OSCE score is obtained in the Skilled category A – (A-) (85-100). Spearman correlation test results show there is no relationship between self-confidence and OSCE score results (p-value = 0.137). A total of (91.8%) have high self-esteem, (6.8%) are in the medium category, (1.4) are in the low self-esteem category. The OSCE score is obtained in the Skilled category A – (A-) (85-100). The results of the Spearman correlation test show that there is a relationship between self-esteem and OSCE score results (p-value = 0.035).Self-confidence is a supporting factor, not the main one. Self-confidence may play a greater role in mental readiness or anxiety reduction, but is not a direct determinant of OSCE scores. Where the complexity of the Determining Factors for OSCE scores is a complex and multidimensional assessment, so self-confidence is only one of many factors that can influence OSCE scores. Self-esteem can play an important role in influencing learning outcomes, and OSCE scores. Apart from feeling self-confident, students must also have self-esteem so that students have great motivation in carrying out the learning process and have a positive impact on the learning outcomes obtained.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
(1) Usman S, Firawati, Zulkifli. Jurnal Sains dan Kesehatan. J Sains dan Kesehat. 2021;3(1):430–6.
(2) Islamiyah S, Inayah Z. Hubungan antara tingkat ketakutan dan kepercayaan dalam berurusan dengan OSCE di antara siswa di Sekolah Kedokteran Umum Universitas Malahayati di Kelas 2019. Jurnal Malahayati. 2023:10(3)
(3) Elindra MZR, Oktaria D, Aries R. Hubungan Tingkat Kecemasan Terhadap Hasil Ujian OSCE Pada Mahasiswa Tingkat Pertama Di Dakultas Universitas Lampung.2019;9(1):123-7
(4) Alghifari MM, Hartono, Randhita ABT. Studi kualitatif ketakutan mahasiswa kedokteran dalam pengujian klinis terstruktur secara objektif (OSCE)Pendidik medis dan kesehatan Nexus.2016;5(2):145–60.
(5) Jembise TL, Indra D, Rante H. Hubungan Kecemasan Dan Hasil Ujian Osce (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Periode Februari 2017 Universitas Cenderawasih. 2018;275–84.
(6) Alkalah C. Hubungan Efikasi Diri Dengan Nilai Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Pada Mahasiswa Tahun Ketiga Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Riau. 2016;19(5):1–23.
(7) Eka V, Suwandi P, Santi DE, Ananta A, Psikologi F, Suwandi EP. keyakinan di antara kaum muda:Apakah ada peran karena takut evaluasi negatif?Inn J Psychol Res.2023;3(2):366–74.
(8) Safitri NA. Hubungan antara kepercayaan diri dan perilaku menipu siswa pada fokus Departemen Akuntansi Sekolah Kejuruan Yatpi Godong.MAJ LONTAR .2022;34(2):118–29.
(9) Widyana AI, Sarwono RB. Peran Konsep Diri Dalam Membentuk Kepercayaan Diri Mahasiswa. 2023;5:26–32.
(10) Angelina P, Christanti FD, Mulya HC. Tinjauan seorang gadis remaja yang harga diri yang merasa tidak lengkap karena aktivitas fisik.Ex J Psychol Indonesia 2021;9(2):94–103.
(11) Salsabila DF, Saffanah Qalbi AF, Aziz AM, Etniko A, Tahir Rauf KN. Perbedaan harga diri antara universitas negara bagian dan swasta.SiswaSychol.2022;1(1):45–56.
(12) Mokalu VR, Boangmanalu CVJ. Teori psikososial Erik Erikson. VOX Edukasi Ilmu Pendidikan.2021;12(20:180-92
(13) Rupawan, I Kadek & Andini, Farah & Puspitasari I. Healthy Tadulako Journal ( Indah Puspasari K . D , Farah Andini J . J , I Kadek R : 39-44 ) P 2019;5(1):39–44.
(14) Puji GAK, Aditya AM, Gismin SS. Pengaruh Kepercayaan Diri (Self Confidence) Terhadap Perilaku Asertif Pada Mahasiswa Di Kota Makassar. J Psikol Karakter. 2024;4(1):353–9.
(15) Firmansyah, Budiastuti VI, Maftuhah A, Hastami Y. Hubungan Antara Efektivitas Pelatihan Klinik dan Motivasi Mahasiswa Terhadap Nilai OSCE Skill Lab Komunikasi. Plex Med J. 2024;2(6):241–53.
(16) Nurcahyo DS, Subandono J, Wijayanti L. Hubungan antara frekuensi dan motivasi mengikuti dukungan dari lab keterampilan OSCE.Pelatihan Medis Kesehatan Nexus 2015;4(2):64–75.
(17) Erianti S, Lestari RF, Mahasiswa E, Hangtuah S. Menerapkan metode evaluasi OSCE (tes klinis terstruktur objektif) Siswa Stikes Pekanbaru 2021;05(01):45
(18) Kurniasih I. Lima Komponen Penting dalam Perencanaan OSCE
Five Essential Keys in OSCE Planning. 2014;3(1):42–51.
(19) Ramadhany NF, Khoiriyah U. Pandangan Mahasiswa Mengenai Fungsi Pasien Simulasi Dalam Ujian OSCE Di Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Islam Indonesia. Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Indonesia
(20) Khairunnisa. Perbedaan Self Esteem Ditinjau Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamamin. Angew Chemie Int Ed 6(11), 951–952. 2021;2013–5.
(21) Diri H, Esteem S, Diri PH. Bab II Landasan Teori Harga Diri. 2012;9–25.
(22) Sandhya Bhatt. Role of Self Worth and Belief in One's Abilitiesin Achievement Drive among University Scholars. Int J Indian Psychol. 2018;6(2).
(23) D’Mello L, Monteiro M, Pinto N. A Research on the Relationship Between Self Worth and Academic Success in Students. Int J Heal Sci Pharm. 2018;2(1):1–7.
(24) Sudarta.Hubungan Harga Diri Dengan Prestasi Belajar Mhasiswa Kedokteran Universitas RIAU 2022;16(1):1–23.