Perilaku Verifikasi Mahasiswa Terhadap Rekomendasi Generative AI Dalam Keputusan Akademik
Students’ Verification Behaviors toward Generative AI Recommendations in Academic Decision-Making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33084/m0kh9536Keywords:
generative AI, verifikasi informasi, keputusan akademik, mahasiswa, warranted relianceAbstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) semakin digunakan mahasiswa untuk memperoleh rekomendasi dalam keputusan akademik, tetapi keluaran yang meyakinkan tidak selalu akurat atau didukung sumber yang sahih. Penelitian ini bertujuan memetakan konteks penggunaan GenAI, tindakan verifikasi, dan keputusan mahasiswa setelah verifikasi. Survei deskriptif potong lintang dilakukan secara daring pada 6–18 Oktober 2026. Dari 167 respons masuk, 147 respons memenuhi kriteria persetujuan dan penggunaan GenAI dalam tiga bulan terakhir. Data dianalisis menggunakan frekuensi, persentase, mean, simpangan baku, median, dan analisis sensitivitas. ChatGPT menjadi platform utama (59,2%). Rekomendasi paling sering digunakan untuk pemilihan sumber (24,5%) dan penyelesaian masalah (21,1%); 80,3% keputusan dilakukan dalam waktu kurang dari dua jam. Responden melaporkan rata-rata 6,96 dari sembilan tindakan verifikasi. Tindakan terbanyak ialah menilai kesesuaian dengan konteks (93,6%), membaca sumber asli (91,9%), meminta alasan (91,7%), dan mengajukan ulang pertanyaan (91,4%). Setelah pemeriksaan, 57,8% menyesuaikan rekomendasi dan 19,7% hanya menggunakan bagian yang sesuai, sedangkan 10,9% menggunakannya tanpa perubahan. Hasil menunjukkan kecenderungan verifikasi yang luas, tetapi belum membuktikan ketepatan keputusan atau warranted reliance karena kualitas keluaran dan keputusan akhir tidak dinilai secara objektif. Perguruan tinggi perlu menjadikan pemeriksaan sumber, pembandingan independen, dan dokumentasi alasan keputusan sebagai bagian eksplisit dari literasi AI.
Downloads
References
Abdilah, Y. A. (2023). Tinjauan sistematis etika penggunaan ChatGPT di perguruan tinggi. Integralistik, 34(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.15294/integralistik.v34i2.50278
Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Huamaní Jordan, O., López Roca, C., & Saavedra Tirado, K. (2024). Analysis of college students' attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT in their academic activities: Effect of intent to use, verification of information and responsible use. BMC Psychology, 12, 255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01764-z
Alam, T. H. I., & Windiarti, I. S. (2025). The future of artificial intelligence in interactive learning: Trends, challenges, opportunities. Engineering Proceedings, 84(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025084087
Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Fischer, I., Sweeney, S., Lucas, M., & Gupta, N. (2024). Making sense of generative AI for assessments: Contrasting student claims and assessor evaluations. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(3), 101081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101081
Grawitch, M. J., Winton, S. L., & Mudigonda, S. P. (2026). Who listens to ChatGPT and when should they? A two-study examination of AI-assisted decision making. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 7, 100283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2026.100283
Hauptman, A. I., Schelble, B. G., Duan, W., Flathmann, C., & McNeese, N. J. (2024). Understanding the influence of AI autonomy on AI explainability levels in human-AI teams using a mixed methods approach. Cognition, Technology & Work, 26, 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-024-00765-7
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., Weller, J., Kuhn, J., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Ng, D. T. K., Tan, C. W., & Leung, J. K. L. (2024). Empowering student self-regulated learning and science education through ChatGPT: A pioneering pilot study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55, 1328–1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13454
Oates, A., & Johnson, D. (2025). ChatGPT in the classroom: Evaluating its role in fostering critical evaluation skills. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35, 1793–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00452-8
Rizaldi, M., Sasalia, P., & Pancarita, P. (2024). Efektivitas ChatGPT untuk mendorong berpikir kritis mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah aljabar. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v12i1.18668
Sabrina, E., Yulianti, R., Ambiyar, & Rizal, F. (2024). Mengeksplor dampak interaksi siswa dengan ChatGPT terhadap berpikir kritis dan pemecahan masalah. The Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 13(3), 4875–4883. https://doi.org/10.33022/ijcs.v13i3.4073
Schemmer, M., Kühl, N., Benz, C., Bartos, A., & Satzger, G. (2023). Appropriate reliance on AI advice: Conceptualization and the effect of explanations. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1145/3581641.3584066
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
von Garrel, J., & Mayer, J. (2024). Which features of AI-based tools are important for students? A choice-based conjoint analysis. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100311
Windiarti, I. S., Bahri, S., & Prabowo, A. (2023). Melangkah maju dengan teknologi Generative AI: Peningkatan kompetensi kepala sekolah SMP di Kota Palangkaraya. Parta: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.38043/parta.v4i1.4344
Zein, S., Yaniawati, R. P., & Mudrikah, A. (2024). The role and evaluation of ChatGPT as a virtual tutor in improving students' creative and critical abilities reviewed from probing-prompting abilities. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 15(2), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.15294/a2g5x690
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ika Safitri Windiarti, Agung Prabowo, Fathimah Azzahra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording.
