Repositioning Teachers' Instructional Language Based on the Huma Betang Philosophy to Optimize Primary School Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
Teachers' instructional language serves as the primary medium for transferring knowledge, shaping character, and managing classrooms in primary schools. This study aims to analyze the urgency of primary school teachers' instructional language skills in balancing material complexity (intrinsic load) and minimizing informational distractions (extraneous load), while simultaneously integrating a humanist approach rooted in local wisdom. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach with a content analysis method, the study reveals that specific, empathetic, and adaptive linguistic structures tailored to the cognitive development of children aged 7–12 significantly enhance information retention and students' emotional engagement. Furthermore, the internalization of the Huma Betang philosophy and Belom Bahadat values within teachers' discourse is proven to cultivate a psychological safety zone that optimizes children's brain function.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Any article on the copyright is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share work with an acknowledgment of the work authors and initial publications in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published articles of work (eg, post-institutional repository) or publish it in a book, with acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
Abubakar, A., Ngalimun, N., Liadi, F., & Latifah, L. (2021). Bahasa sebagai nilai perekat dalam simbol budaya lokal tokoh agama. Jurnal Transformatif (Islamic Studies), 4(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.23971/tf.v4i2.2174
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Longman.
Badriah, S., A’ini, N. N., Marhamah, M., Majidi, M. W., & Anshari, M. R. (2025). Mewariskan pendidikan karakter melalui filosofi Huma Betang di Kota Palangka Raya. Jurnal Penelitian Tarbawi: Pendidikan Islam Dan Isu-Isu Sosial, 10(1), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.37216/tarbawi.v10i1.2304
Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2024). Conditional indirect effects of clarity on students’ information processing: Disentangling sources of cognitive load. Communication Education, 73(3), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2024.2303438
Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051001005
Çeken, B., & Taşkın, N. (2022). Multimedia learning principles in different learning environments: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00200-2
Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2001). The relationship of teacher clarity and immediacy with student state anxiety, affect, and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50(1), 59–68.
Cruickshank, D. R., Jenkins, D. B., & Metcalf, K. M. (2012). The Act of Teaching. McGraw-Hill.
Dakir, D. (2017). Pengelolaan budaya inklusif berbasis nilai Belom Bahadat pada Huma Betang dan transformasi sosial masyarakat Dayak Kalimantan Tengah. Religió: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 7(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.15642/religio.v7i1.707
Emmer, E. T., & Evertson, C. M. (2013). Classroom Management for Elementary Teachers. Pearson.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, N. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Iyamuremye, E., Mukuka, A., & Nsabayezu, E. (2025). Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract instruction: Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency in mathematics. Cogent Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2558303
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Liu, D. (2024). The effects of segmentation on cognitive load, vocabulary learning and retention, and reading comprehension in a multimedia learning environment. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01489-5
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Myers, S. A., Goodboy, A. K., & 600, M. of C. (2014). College student learning, motivation, and satisfaction as a function of effective instructor communication behaviors. Southern Communication Journal, 7(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2013.815266
Oschwald, A., Moeller, J., Kracke, B., Viljaranta, J., & Dietrich, J. (2025). Student motivation and instructional clarity: Linking experience sampling method data to objective behavioural observations. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(Suppl. 1), S281–S299. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12775
Salasiah, S., & Anwar, K. (2025). Integrating the Huma Betang philosophy into progressive Islamic education in elementary schools: A study on curriculum development. TUNAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 10(2), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.33084/tunas.v10i2.9899
Serki, N., & Bolkan, S. (2024). The effect of clarity on learning: Impacting motivation through cognitive load. Communication Education, 73(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2023.2250883
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.
Sion, H., & Affandi, M. (2024). The multicultural values of the Huma Betang philosophy as a foundation for character building in elementary school students. Proceeding International Conference on Education, 107–113. https://jurnalfaktarbiyah.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/proceedings/article/view/2729
Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (12th ed.). Pearson.
Syahrin, A. A., & Mustika, B. (2020). Etnopedagogi berlandaskan nilai-nilai Rumah Betang dalam pembelajaran sosiologi. ENTITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 2(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.19105/ejpis.v2i2.3923
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Yuliandari, R. N., Sa’dijah, C., Susiswo, & Purnomo. (2024). Teachers’ multiple representations on teaching fractions at elementary school: A commognitive framework. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(2), 1005–1018. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i2.5048