Perbandingan Hasil Pemeriksaan Hitung Jumlah Eritrosit Menggunakan EDTA Konvensional dan Vacutainer

Comparison of Erythrocyte Count Examination Results using Conventional EDTA and Vacutainer

Authors

  • Lilis Septiana Dewi Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Tantri Analisawati Sudarsono Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Retno Sulistiyowati Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33084/jsm.v7i2.2842

Keywords:

Erythrocyte, Conventional EDTA, Vacutainer

Abstract

Hematology examination in practice often uses anticoagulants to prevent clotting in blood samples, including in the examination of the erythrocyte count. The anticoagulant that is often used for examination is EDTA (Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic Acid). With the changing times, the addition of anticoagulants to the examination is no longer done conventionally but is already contained in the vacutainer tube. However, the vacutainer anticoagulant cannot be adjusted to the blood volume obtained during phlebotomy, while the conventional anticoagulant can be added according to the blood volume obtained. This research is a pre-experimental research design with a One-Shot Case Study design, in which each blood sample is added with conventional anticoagulants and vacutainers. The method used is manual using a hemocytometer and a microscope. Analysis of the data using the Independent T-test. The purpose of this study was to find out the comparison of the results of the erythrocyte count using conventional EDTA and a vacutainer. After examination with both anticoagulants, p-value = 0.822 (p>0.05) so there is no comparison. Based on these results, it can be concluded that there is no comparison of erythrocyte count examination using conventional EDTA and vacutainer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Siswanto. Darah dan Cairan Tubuh. Diktat Fisiol Vet I. Published online 2017:1-49.
2. Sari R, Panggabean A, Erwin. Pemanfaatan Resin Ca-Alginat Termodifikasi Dengan Etilena Diaminena Tetraasetat (Edta) Dalam Tahapan Prakonsentrasi Ion Mn(Ii) Berbasis Metode Kolom
Rahma Juwita Sari*, Aman Sentosa Panggabean, Erwin. (Ii):28-35.
3. Pramytasari, E., Krihariyani, D., Wahyuni S. Sitrat Estimasi Perhitungan Jumlah Trombosit Sampel Darah Terhadap Sampel Darah Ethylendiaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA). Jurnal Analis Kesehatan Sains Volume 5 No.2. Hal 374. 2016;5(2):2014-2016.
4. Radheya IP. Pengaruh Variasi Volume Darah pada Tabung Vacutainer Tripotasium Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetate (K3EDTA) Terhadap Jumlah Trombosit. Pengaruh Variasi Vol Darah pada Tabung Vacutainer Tripotasium Ethyl Diamine Tetraacetate Terhadap Jumlah Trombosit. 2018;D.
5. Adzaki MZ. Pengaruh Volume Darah Pada Tabung Vacuntainer K3edta Terhadap Nilai Led Metode Manuscript Program Studi D Iv Analis Kesehatan Pengaruh Volume Darah Pada Tabung Vacuntainer K3edta Terhadap Nilai Led Metode Westergren. 2018;D.
6. Garini A. Otomatik Pada Darah Yang Ditambahkan Antikoagulan Na 2 Edta 10 % Dengan K 2 Edta Vacutainer. 2011;(8):75-78.
7. Kuman MY. Perbedaan jumlah eritrosit, leukosit dan trombosit pada pemberian antikoagulan konvensional dan edta vacutainer karya tulis ilmiah. Published online 2019.
8. Oktiyani N, Fahriyan F, Muhlisin A. Akurasi Hitung Jumlah Eritrosit Metode Manual dan Metode Otomatis. Med Lab Technol J. 2017;3(2):37. doi:10.31964/mltj.v3i2.166
9. Wahdaniah W, Tumpuk S. Perbedaan Penggunaan Antikoagulan K2EDTA DAN K3EDTA Terhadap Hasil Pemeriksaan Indeks Eritrosit. J Lab Khatulistiwa. 2018;1(2):114. doi:10.30602/jlk.v1i2.147

Downloads

Published

2022-02-01

How to Cite

Dewi, L. S., Sudarsono, T. A., & Sulistiyowati, R. (2022). Perbandingan Hasil Pemeriksaan Hitung Jumlah Eritrosit Menggunakan EDTA Konvensional dan Vacutainer: Comparison of Erythrocyte Count Examination Results using Conventional EDTA and Vacutainer. Jurnal Surya Medika (JSM), 7(2), 181–184. https://doi.org/10.33084/jsm.v7i2.2842

Most read articles by the same author(s)