POLITIK HUKUM PERADILAN AGAMA DALAM PROSEDUR PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARI’AH
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The existence of the judiciary for the Muslims is a discretion. The religious courts as litigation institutions have absolute authority. Since the birth of Act No. 3 in 2006, Sharia economic disputes have fallen within the scope of absolute jurisdiction. However, the legislative provisions that have been introduced recently have reduced the authority in question. Based on the Law on Religious Justice and reinforced by the Constitutional Court Decision No. 93 of 2012 has its own advantages and constraints in the exercise of its role. The results of this study show that the Religious Court, in addition to limiting the forms of non-litigation settlement that can be chosen, also constitutes a new norm that the parties are granted rights by means of obstacles which it makes shift the power of the court in the environment of religious justice to power in the general environment of justice. In addition to the settlement of economic disputes of the Shariah: Sources of the Law of Events (Formal Law) and Material Law Sources, consisting of: Regulations of Laws-Laws, Fatwa-fatwa of the National Council of Shari'ah (DSN), Aqad Treaty (Contract), Fiqih and Ushul Fiqich, Customary Habits, and Jurisprudence.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors continue to retain the copyright to the article if the article is published in the Jurnal Hadratul Madaniyah. They will also retain the publishing rights to the article without any restrictions.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Any article on the copyright is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share work with an acknowledgment of the work authors and initial publications in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published articles (e.g., post-institutional repository) or publish them in a book, with acknowledgment of their initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during submission. This can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citations of published work.
- The article and any associated published material are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ahmad Kamil dan M. Fauzan, 2004, Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Yurisprudensi, Khairul Bayan, Jakarta
Abdul Ghofur Anshori, 2007, Peradilan Agama di Indonesia Pasca UU No. 3 Tahun 2006 (Sejarah, Kedudukan & Kewenangan), UII Press, Yogyakarta.
CST Kansil, 1986, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Idonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.
Fuady, Munir, 2000, Arbitrase Nasional, alternative penyelesaian sengketa bisnis, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Majalah IKAHI Sudikno Mertokusumo, 1999, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty,Yogyakarta.
Suyud Margono, 2000, ADR dan Arbitrase,Proses Pelembagaan dan Aspek Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
________________, 2005, Hukum Acara Perdata, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan kehakiman.
Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama.
Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama
Undang-Undang Nomor 21Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah.
www.badilag.net